[beet]

Originally posted by benVFR
You've got to be kidding to compare him to Hitler.. Hitler could be described as an evil mad genius.. he took over Germany starting with nothing and almost brought the whole world to it's knees after bringing a wrecked country back to superpower status. He made some retarded decisions yet it still took almost the entire world allied against him to stop him.

Kim Jong Il just happened to be born in the right place with the right silver spoon in his mouth. He's never captured anything or run a single military campaign.

Definitely evil but nowhere near Hitler, and nowhere near as dangerous.

As to lack of division among NESR members.. I think there would be way less division in the US about Iraq if Saddam had really had Nuclear weapons. I think if we had found chemical weapons and maybe biological weapons there would still be some division, but probably not if he'd gone nuclear.