Quote:
Originally Posted by hessogood  I'm yet to hear how or when this guy broke the law.
He said "I'm trying to take my hands out". That would lead most people to asume he was 'trying to take his hands out' and might be inhibbited by the effects of three taser shots. The effects of each that can last serveral minutes. And I haven't been able to read anywhere that the pepper spray or the knife were in his sweatshirt pocket. I'm pretty sure if they were that would be clearly pointed out. |
I have a feeling the "I'm trying to take my hands out" was something added in by a bystander, like much of the story. As for the knife and pepper spray, it says he had them on his person but was not "brandishing" them, which typically means displaying; thus, they'd have to be in his pockets or in his pants, etc.
This story is just way too far out there. A team of cops are not going to walk up and taser and shoot a guy with no provocation in front of a bunch of bystanders for no good reason, no matter how crooked they may (or may not) be. Think of it this way: whats in it for them? WHY would a cop walk up on someone and shoot them for no apparent reason? What would be the benefit?
It just doesn't add up.
