Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisNoF4i  You can't possibly agree with that statement. I understand if you're just name dropping to get some attention, because - well because it's you. But that statement leads into a ridiculous assumption that the Vick case is unnecessarily taking resources away from other ongoing investigations in other parts of the country. Breaking the law is breaking the law. It shouldn't matter whether the victim is a dog or a duck or a human being. We can't say, "Oh just drop the charges because there are more heinous crimes that we need to solve."
The funny thing about the racial undertones is this: Dogs are property, yet some people treat them as if they were human or part of the family. That sounds an awful lot like how black folks were once treated in this country. |
no, maybe i should have explained a little better, I believe this situation has gotten more attention to it that Darrent's murder. I think that if it had been given this much attention, maybe more witnesses would have come forward to help with the investigation... I am not saying in any way shape or form that its taking resources away or that it shouldn't be investigated/charged to the fullest extent of the law.
o and FU on the whole name dropping shit thats bullshit.