Quote:
Originally Posted by DucDave  Sounds a lot like the point the Michael Crighton was making in
|
I actually just read this a few months back, its a great read. There's a conference coming up (in NYC) to shed some light on the topic. Here's some excerpts from the website...
"The global warming debate that the public and policymakers usually see is one-sided, dominated by government scientists and government organizations agenda-driven to find data that suggest a human impact on climate and to call for immediate government action, if only to fund their own continued research, but often to achieve political agendas entirely unrelated to the science of climate change. There is another side, but in recent years it has been denied a platform from which to speak."
"...an antidote to the one-sided and alarmist bias that pervades much of the current public policy debate..."
"...turn the debate toward sound science and economics, and away from hype and political manipulation..."
instead of reading the picket signs of hippie wackos, perhaps the media should consult a paleo-climatologist. "the past is the key to the future"