View Single Post
  #60  
Old 05-02-08, 03:01 PM
taxonomy taxonomy is offline
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 205

Re: More controversial pipe info


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayspeed View Post
Because 27% will have a gain too. The gain from exhaust is minimal on a stock motor. It could span the whole rpm range. In some cases, it may arch upward more in some areas than others. Seeing how your practical, don't buy one. If I were you though, I'd get one just to see for yourself so you could end your eternal research.
If you never use more than 80% of throttle position you could just dial in a couple more degrees. Do people ride fast bikes with the throttle all the way open? On the street?

I actually bought a used bike with a Two Brothers can on it. I purchased a stock system to replace it with. All of this arose basically because I was riding back and forth to work and wondering what the change would be. The I started asking myself how this stuff actually works. I can't imagine it'll matter to me to go back to stock, but we'll see.

I had a CB1 with and without an exhaust. That was interesting. That bike got ridden wide open a lot.

Just from a theory point of view I'd think a really good fuel mapping system, like a Power Commander III would offer the best real world gains for most people at more throttle positions and RPMs. I think rejetting could offer real world gains too.

I can build the Puch Maxi Moped to it's limits for a lot less than $1000. Raise compression, displacement, pipe , carb, intake, reed valves. So, it'll be interesting to experiment with. For that much money I can build wheels with Aluminum rims too. It'll be interesting to do some tuning again.

Last edited by taxonomy : 05-02-08 at 03:09 PM.
Reply With Quote