Welcome to NESR! Most features of this site require registration, including replying to threads, sending private messages, starting new threads, and uploading files. Click here to register.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 75 of 75

LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

  1. #51
    Registered Boozer PPS26's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    haverhill ma
    Posts
    591

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Doucette lost that race because his superbike blew up out of turn 12 he still finished 2nd.... And a r6 565 is capable of making 110+ hp you can do anything you want to the head/valves/cams.... An I agree is doesn't belong ... Seeing an r6 in group 5 was funny

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #52
    Just Registered rolker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Rochester, NH
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,332

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by csmutty View Post
    Where would the gp. bikes go then?

    There aren't enough of them for their own class.
    We do have our own class, it's called 125GP! Of course I don't want to do just 1 race so I do GTL and bump up to LWGP and ULSB. Is that a problem?

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Roland Arsenault
    LRRS and USCRA #763
    2012, 2013 and 2015 Big Fish Small Pond Champion
    "The 4 board is an upshift marker, not a brake marker"

  3. #53
    Bizarro Zoolander Petorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Windham NH
    Posts
    2,026

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    I was wondering all weekend how I got passed by what sounded like an I4. This is the answer! I was thinking I must have gotten a phenomenal drive out of 12 to get passed at such a small speed differential on the straight.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #54
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,540

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by PPS26 View Post
    And a r6 565 is capable of making 110+
    You're going to spend a metric-fuckton to get there. It's going to be fragile and VERY high maint. To put it bluntly, for the cost of making a singular 110+ HP LWGP R565 I can make two or three of my ULSB builds, based on importing machines from the UK. Hell, it'd be cheaper to get MY machine past the 110+ HP mark.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #55
    First name on the shit list.... SVRACER01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Farmington
    Age
    46
    Posts
    16,968

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    i agree with sav, letting them into SS should be a complete violation of the rules. an SV can have minor engine work and still be eligible for the class but detuning, destroking or shutting down a cylinder isnt minor engine work

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    When I start my KTM in the morning, rules are broken. Its inevitable...
    01 SV650S (RC51 eater)/07 690SM /03 300EXC/14 XTZ1200
    TRACKS:Firebird/NHMS/VIR/Calabogie/California Speedway/NJMP/MMC/NYST/Palmer/Thompson/Club Motorsports

  6. #56
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,540

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    They aren't letting them into SS, they are only LWGP and GTL legal, that's it.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #57
    Member lrrs398's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Wayne NJ
    Age
    59
    Posts
    71

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    And 40 lights and 50 lights. A MW I4 from 1990-1992 like a Honda 600 F2 or GSXR would also be legal to run 40 lights and 50 lights.

    Lightweight Grand Prix or Thunderbike are legal for Lightweight Formula 40.

    LIGHTWEIGHT FORMULA 40 (Formula 40 Lights) (Amateur & Expert Divisions)
    Single cylinder, unlimited displacement
    Two stroke, unlimited displacement
    Twin cylinder, air cooled, push-rod, unlimited displacement
    Twin cylinder, liquid cooled, 3 or less valves per cylinder, unlimited displacement
    Twin cylinder, liquid cooled, 4 valve per cylinder, up to 750cc
    Twin cylinder, liquid cooled, non-desmodromic valves, 4 valve per cylinder, up to 800cc
    Three cylinder, air cooled, non-fuel injected, up to 1200cc
    Four cylinder, liquid cooled, up to 565cc
    Four cylinder, air-cooled, up to 1200cc
    Four cylinder, liquid cooled, 1990 to 1992 model year, up to 650cc
    Four cylinder, liquid cooled (oil or water), pre-1990 model year, up to 860cc
    All air-cooled, 2-valve, unlimited displacement

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by lrrs398; 04-28-15 at 08:38 AM. Reason: Add classes

  8. #58
    Senior Member BMMCBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    CT, USA
    Age
    36
    Posts
    679

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by PPS26 View Post
    Doucette lost that race because his superbike blew up out of turn 12 he still finished 2nd....
    That explains why he pitted in through the T1a gate. I thought he was just throwing a tantrum.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    LRRS AM#721 / RSP Racing / MTAG Pirelli / Woodcraft / Sportbike Track Gear
    2003 Honda CBR600RR / 2009 Kawasaki ER6N / 2013 Kawasaki Ninja 300

  9. #59
    Perpetual Amateur CEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,130

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by tsorfas View Post
    Doucette got beat by one of those 1100 this weekend
    No, he didn't. Motor blew and he rolled across the line. Still kept 2nd.

    edit: just noticed this was already said. whoops.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Zip-Tie Alley Racing
    LRRS/CCS #103
    PPS | Dunlop | Boston Moto | Woodcraft & Armour Bodies | 35 Motorsports | Pit Bull | K&N

  10. #60
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,540

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by lrrs398 View Post
    And 40 lights and 50 lights. A MW I4 from 1990-1992 like a Honda 600 F2 or GSXR would also be legal to run 40 lights and 50 lights.
    Forgot they go LWGP and not LWSB.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  11. #61
    Changes come butcher bergs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    the humbling river
    Posts
    13,009

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Rick places 2nd and the sky starts falling.


    3 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #62
    go faster cdovego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Weymouth
    Age
    43
    Posts
    2,129

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    I didn't think it'd take too long for ol' Grush's hot sender to make it into a forum thread. All words and butthurt aside, it's a cool bike.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Central Mass Powersports #123

    1000rr, zx10r, rmz450, RE classic, r6, S4Rs, xr123, sv650(2), cr250 and a box truck that leaks power steering fluid.

  13. #63
    .. Dayon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Age
    45
    Posts
    104

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    I looked at the dyno sheets from one one the destoked R6's at Loudon. 113hp & 48ft-lbs. This is not a LW bike.

    3 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    DAYON
    CCS/LRRS EX #22
    Sponsors: SVM | SPEARS RACING | VORTEX | GALFER | PIT POSSE | GOPRO | WOODCRAFT | PILOT LEATHERS | SPECTRO | COMPUTRACK | BELL | SPY

  14. #64
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,540

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    They must have figured something new out to un-cork them compared to last year. That said, that's still well in line for Lightweight GP where it's supposed to be the one off nutter builds. If we were talking LWSS I'd agree, but these are supposed to be the built to the nines with no limits other than displacement machines. There are 110+ HP SVs out there, with more torque... Not to mention many of the Ultralight machines can approach those numbers if you like to build to the edge.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #65
    Backwoods lobster boy number9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Waltham, MA
    Posts
    5,335

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Kurlon, you should help me build a true supermono replica. Not sure how we'd get the single cylinder bit happening, but..


    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  16. #66
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,540

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class


    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  17. #67
    Backwoods lobster boy number9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Waltham, MA
    Posts
    5,335

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Hmm, I hadn't seen that one before. I've seen some home-brewed attempts with mid-1990s 900SS frames and thumpers from dirtbikes. At the opposite end of the spectrum is this: The Supermono Strada for a mere £40,000...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  18. #68
    Soul Rider Paul_E_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    western, MA
    Age
    53
    Posts
    15,021

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Had the honor of racing against Jerry Wood on his authentic Supermono for many years. There was much controversy about allowing it in the lightweight classes as it seemed far superior. I was fine with it. Not like a bunch of guys were gonna run out and buy them. I understand it's worth 100k now. Jerry ran it at Daytona this year!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Paul_E_D


  19. #69
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,540

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    I love the fact that he actually takes his rare classics and puts them on the track in anger under a green flag (red spinny lights?).

    Without tearing one down to see what makes it tick, part of me thinks the Panagale 1299 would be an awesome candidate. It's already light, it's crazy oversquare... but no idea if it's design lends it to dropping a rod/piston like the venerable Pantah belt jobbers or not.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  20. #70
    Super Moderator OreoGaborio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    MA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    38,888

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by carsick View Post
    Where was that?
    In front of me for a while in GTL.... then eventually behind me.

    Took a lotta work and some help from traffic, though. Didn't matter how much I out-drove him out of the corners, the second he got upright he was gone.

    Whatevs. Had a blast & got him eventually.

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by OreoGaborio; 04-28-15 at 03:22 PM.
    -Pete LRRS/CCS #81 - ECK Racing, TonysTrackDays
    GMD Computrack Boston | Pine Motorparts/PBE Specialists | Phoenix Graphics | Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media

    The Garage: '03 Tuono | '06 SV650

  21. #71
    Super Moderator OreoGaborio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    MA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    38,888

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by tsorfas View Post
    Doucette got beat by one of those 1100 this weekend. and it will only get worst in the future in my opinion.
    Yeah... It's tough winning races when you're driving out of turn 12 on an SV325.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by OreoGaborio; 04-28-15 at 03:23 PM.
    -Pete LRRS/CCS #81 - ECK Racing, TonysTrackDays
    GMD Computrack Boston | Pine Motorparts/PBE Specialists | Phoenix Graphics | Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media

    The Garage: '03 Tuono | '06 SV650

  22. #72
    Super Moderator OreoGaborio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    MA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    38,888

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by SVRACER01 View Post
    i agree with sav, letting them into SS should be a complete violation of the rules. an SV can have minor engine work and still be eligible for the class but detuning, destroking or shutting down a cylinder isnt minor engine work
    It's not IN supersport.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    -Pete LRRS/CCS #81 - ECK Racing, TonysTrackDays
    GMD Computrack Boston | Pine Motorparts/PBE Specialists | Phoenix Graphics | Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media

    The Garage: '03 Tuono | '06 SV650

  23. #73
    .. Dayon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Age
    45
    Posts
    104

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurlon View Post
    They must have figured something new out to un-cork them compared to last year. That said, that's still well in line for Lightweight GP where it's supposed to be the one off nutter builds. If we were talking LWSS I'd agree, but these are supposed to be the built to the nines with no limits other than displacement machines. There are 110+ HP SVs out there, with more torque... Not to mention many of the Ultralight machines can approach those numbers if you like to build to the edge.
    Sorry, but there are no SV's making 110 HP. If you get a full superbike build in the high 80's with the fuel restriction we have you are doing good.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    DAYON
    CCS/LRRS EX #22
    Sponsors: SVM | SPEARS RACING | VORTEX | GALFER | PIT POSSE | GOPRO | WOODCRAFT | PILOT LEATHERS | SPECTRO | COMPUTRACK | BELL | SPY

  24. #74
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,540

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by Dayon View Post
    Sorry, but there are no SV's making 110 HP. If you get a full superbike build in the high 80's with the fuel restriction we have you are doing good.
    I didn't say they were running LRRS...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  25. #75
    I've been here before. Mustang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milford, CT
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,461

    Re: LightWeight Class VS 650 Twin Class

    Quote Originally Posted by Dayon View Post
    I looked at the dyno sheets from one one the destoked R6's at Loudon. 113hp & 48ft-lbs. This is not a LW bike.
    Holy CHIT. That explains the pull on the straight.

    Quote Originally Posted by OreoGaborio View Post
    In front of me for a while in GTL.... then eventually behind me.

    Took a lotta work and some help from traffic, though. Didn't matter how much I out-drove him out of the corners, the second he got upright he was gone.

    Whatevs. Had a blast & got him eventually.
    That was the most frustrating part - Grush was really only pulling me on the straights.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Bill Cool --- NEMRR EX #8 --- 2023 NEMRR GTO Champion, 2020-21 LRRS LWSS Champion --- RSP Racing / TTD / MTAG-Pirelli / Woodcraft / Sportbike Track Gear / Seacoast Sport Cycle

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Hayden is such a class act.
    By scottieducati in forum Pit Area
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-03-11, 06:37 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-23-07, 09:36 AM
  3. got into class!
    By igneous in forum General Bike Related
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-24-03, 03:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •