[Nix]

Originally Posted by l3uddha

THANK YOU!

I second that shit right there!!!!

[TheIglu]

Pardon me, but Barak has been the only person concerned in the least with the country that is harboring Bin Laden.

I'll take someone with no record over someone with a record like Huckabee or Hillary anyday.

[highsider]

Yeah, talk shit about Obama!

You know, just as long as you aren't a veteran.

[greenmonster]

Originally Posted by TheIglu

Pardon me, but Barak has been the only person concerned in the least with the country that is harboring Bin Laden.

I'll take someone with no record over someone with a record like Huckabee or Hillary anyday.

And I'll take McCain over both of them, since they're the only two remaining items on the Democratic menu. As far as Obama being the only person concerned about Pakistan, well Im sure all the candidates, Democrat or Republican, are concerned about that country...from Bin Laden's hiding out there, to their nuclear stockpiles being vulnerable to terrorist attack. Obama had better be concerned about more than Pakistan. If not, he's a one-trick wonder. And that gets old real quick.

[vfr99999]

Right on the money Joel. Obama is a cross between Neville Chamberland, Jimmy Carter and Sidney Potier. Fuel is a depleting resource the big reserves are in places that do not hold our interests. Russia, Argentina and most of the Middle East. Obamas changes will put the last nail into the working mans coffin. Obama is a leader in the blame America first group and lets be nore like socialist europe.

[TheIglu]

Yes, you can blame America for refusing to realize that oil should NOT be a main concern for any country.

I'm all for someone putting the nail in the coffin of a bloated inefficient state regulated industry of waste, pollution, taxation and gluttony.

[TheIglu]

It's really mint that we'll invade a country for not having anything but we won't touch a country that is harboring the reason we went to war. So far Obama has been the only one with the nuts to say that we should go and get OBL no matter where he is located and no matter what "permission" we get.

[Doc]

Umm.. You do know that we are in Afganistan fighting right? Actively searching for OBL... ???

[TheIglu]

Read the (old) news.

We are in Afganistan fighting the Taliban.

[Doc]

Umm yeah and who leads the Taliban? Mullah Mohammed Omar who is harboring OBL...

Leader of that other Terrorist group... Al-Qaeda

[TheIglu]

Originally Posted by Doc

Umm yeah and who leads the Taliban? Mullah Mohammed Omar who is harboring OBL...

.....in Pakistan....

[TheIglu]

Actually, you're right. We should attack the Phillipeans. There is a big radical Islamic movement going on there and OBL isn't there.

[l3uddha]

osama is just a figurehead. catching him isn't going to stop the taliban from blowing people up and chopping off heads.

[Doc]

OBL = Al Qaeda which numbers about 3000 people. OBL is the money for that organization.

Mullah Mohammed Omar = Taliban... Which had been the ruling faction in Afganistan.

Jainal Antel Sali Jr AKA Abu Solaiman (Killed Jan 2007) = Abu Sayyaf The radical Islamic group in the Phillipines

[TheIglu]

Originally Posted by l3uddha

osama is just a figurehead. catching him isn't going to stop the taliban from blowing people up and chopping off heads.

Exactly. So why not invade any other country?

Let's go for them all!

I hear Iran has a bunch of shitheads in there. Oh, wait...we don't want to do that, do we.

[TheIglu]

Just to be clear:

I'm not saying Obama is a good choice. I'm just calling bullshit on the "he won't do anything.....terrorism.....Iraq....oil" argument. Last I checked, nobody knew what the future held and we didn't know Bush wanted to get us unvolved in a shitstorm.

[number9]

I don't think I'd vote for Sen. Obama, but what credentials did Pres. Bush have before taking the office? Running the Texas Rangers (woop!) and being the Governor of Texas aren't exactly massive accomplishments... are they?

I don't get it, we had one Republican President that was an actor (Pres. Reagan) and another one wanted to President (Sen. Thompson) and its the Democrats who are short on experience?

[Kham]

i dont get it. how is pulling out of iraq will result in > $4/gallon? is the oil in iraq going to shutdown and OPEC can't produce enough barrels? or is iraq alone going to jack up the price per barrel for USA only?

from last debate i think clinton seems genuine or could be im in touch with my famenent side. seems most people espacialy the guys hated her. could it be a guy thing that no woman's rule over me thingie? i dont know about obama. yeah he seems like all talk.

[TheIglu]

Originally Posted by Kham

yeah he seems like all talk.

To me, they all do.

[Kham]

Originally Posted by TheIglu

To me, they all do.

right but one seems more than others.

[vfr99999]

The blotted and the gluttons will not lose much IGLU but the people that live paycheck to paycheck will have it tough. State run system? You cannot be talking about our Oil industry must be the state run industry in Europe that taxes the fuel so gas is between 8 and 9 dollers per gallon. They do pollute less because they cannot afford alot of fuel. The change many are wanting will be regreated by most

[Kham]

Originally Posted by vfr99999

The blotted and the gluttons will not lose much IGLU but the people that live paycheck to paycheck will have it tough. State run system? You cannot be talking about our Oil industry must be the state run industry in Europe that taxes the fuel so gas is between 8 and 9 dollers per gallon. They do pollute less because they cannot afford alot of fuel. The change many are wanting will be regreated by most

he told you he didn't care about oil price. he's got woods stacked up so high if you jump off you commit suicide. maybe everyone could be made to buy wood stove and import woods from alaska when they dig up for oil there.

[l3uddha]

great. we should all get a wood furnace to heat our homes. then we can get up in the middle of the night to throw a few logs onto it, and we'll end up spending more money on wood than oil! what is this the fucking 1800s?!

first of all, not everyone lives in the middle of the fucking woods.

second, we do that and pretty soon you'll turn around and start bitching about the rain forests again! HA!

[Kham]

Originally Posted by l3uddha

great. we should all get a wood furnace to heat our homes. then we can get up in the middle of the night to throw a few logs onto it, and we'll end up spending more money on wood than oil! what is this the fucking 1800s?!

first of all, not everyone lives in the middle of the fucking woods.

second, we do that and pretty soon you'll turn around and start bitching about the rain forests again! HA!

well they can packaged up the wood and ship it to the supermarket right under the prudentail building there. have you been to hay market in boston? don't tell that to the IGLU man.

[l3uddha]

Originally Posted by Kham

well they can packaged up the wood and ship it to the supermarket right under the prudentail building there. have you been to hay market in boston? don't tell that to the IGLU man.