[Karaya One]

I believe the democrats have suddenly developed a keen sense of morality. John Edwards has been banned from making a speech at the democratic convention for having an affair and lying about it.

Bill Clinton will speak in his place.

[-jro-]

haha for real? Are they not letting Edwards speak at the DNC?

[Pittenger5]

Who gives a fuck, does tapping a broad that aint his wife make him a bad leader?
Plus, everyone already knows politicians are liars and cheaters, so this isnt exactly a new phenominom

[-jro-]

Originally Posted by Pittenger5

Who gives a fuck, does tapping a broad that aint his wife make him a bad leader?
Plus, everyone already knows politicians are liars and cheaters, so this isnt exactly a new phenominom

not to mention in the grand scheme of things....the democrats got nothing compared to the republicans on this one.... at least he was with a woman and not another man...or little boy...

[ceo and a bunch of numbers]

Bill Clinton should be commended, not reprimanded.

He made a fine choice. Everyone know fat chicks give good head.... because they HAVE to. And they're hungry.

[Pittenger5]

Seriously, to quote CSI: there's 2 things a celebrity doesnt want to be caught with, a dead hooker, or a living boy.

[l3uddha]

Originally Posted by Pittenger5

Who gives a fuck, does tapping a broad that aint his wife make him a bad leader?

he's ok only if he tapped her butt. the vagina is for married people only; both sides can agree on that.

[Pittenger5]

Originally Posted by ceo012384

He made a fine choice. Everyone know fat chicks give good head.... because they HAVE to. And they're hungry.

Ugly chicks too! Minus the hungry part.

[l3uddha]

Originally Posted by Pittenger5

Ugly chicks too! Minus the hungry part.

don't forget little boys

[-jro-]

Originally Posted by l3uddha

don't forget little boys

[Pittenger5]

Originally Posted by l3uddha

don't forget little boys

Wow! That just escalated quickly!

[richw]

Demorats sat on Edwards for some reason we will never know.

Maybe he was demanding a part of
Da Obamanation

In the old days he would have just had an accident I guess theyt are getting soft.

[kbroderick]

Originally Posted by Pittenger5

Seriously, to quote CSI: there's 2 things a celebrity doesnt want to be caught with, a dead hooker, or a living boy.

You mean:

Originally Posted by Edwin Edwards

The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy.

Attributed to Edwin Edwards in the Wikipedia article, which seems to be backed up by other online sources.

[Woodsy]

Originally Posted by -jro-

not to mention in the grand scheme of things....the democrats got nothing compared to the republicans on this one.... at least he was with a woman and not another man...or little boy...

ok ok i admit sarah palin slept with a man (but we all kind of expected that). wtf does this have to do with the mccain camp? did he do some little boys i was unaware of?

[bigred875]

Originally Posted by REDVTR1000

ok ok i admit sarah palin slept with a man (but we all kind of expected that). wtf does this have to do with the mccain camp? did he do some little boys i was unaware of?

larry craig

[jnm988]

I don't see what the BFD is. JFK, this country's golden boy, was fucking celebrities, hookers, you name it. The difference then was that the media had respect for what is and isn't necessary for the public to know. The only time someone's sexual activity should come into question is when its interfering with their ability to do the job they were elected/appointed to do.

Getting blown in the oval office is one thing, using the US HOR Page Program to troll for young boys is another.

[-jro-]

Originally Posted by REDVTR1000

ok ok i admit sarah palin slept with a man (but we all kind of expected that). wtf does this have to do with the mccain camp? did he do some little boys i was unaware of?

erm, I didn't think we were talking about McCain in this thread?

[bigred875]

Originally Posted by jnm988

I don't see what the BFD is. JFK, this country's golden boy, was fucking celebrities, hookers, you name it. The difference then was that the media had respect for what is and isn't necessary for the public to know. The only time someone's sexual activity should come into question is when its interfering with their ability to do the job they were elected/appointed to do.

Getting blown in the oval office is one thing, using the US HOR Page Program to troll for young boys is another.

oh ya that guy too..lol what was his name? in his defense weren't the "boys" over 18?

[-jro-]

Originally Posted by bigred875

larry craig

eh, I was more leaning toward Fowley in reference to boys....but take your pick lol

[-jro-]

Originally Posted by bigred875

oh ya that guy too..lol what was his name? in his defense weren't the "boys" over 18?

Yea thats him I love how they always think they're gonna get away with it or something.... freaking politicians.

[jnm988]

Originally Posted by bigred875

oh ya that guy too..lol what was his name? in his defense weren't the "boys" over 18?

They are typically high school juniors, so he was 17 when he started as a page.

[bigred875]

what a creep

[Pittenger5]

Literally the only reason I'd want to be president is to tap every piece of Hollywood starlet ass I could get my hands on. What other reason is there?

[bigred875]

Originally Posted by Pittenger5

Literally the only reason I'd want to be president is to tap every piece of Hollywood starlet ass I could get my hands on. What other reason is there?

steal money and start wars duh!

[Pittenger5]

ehh, Im a make love not wars kind guy. Specially when the making love is to Paris Hilton.