Welcome to NESR! Most features of this site require registration, including replying to threads, sending private messages, starting new threads, and uploading files. Click here to register.

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

  1. #1
    Lifer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central MA
    Posts
    2,106

    Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    I bought this bike new in March of 2013. I am over 50, and have been riding dirt bikes since I was 6, so I have a lot of dirt riding experience. Although I never really competed in any series, I have ridden some events – NETRA Hare Scrambles, Turkey Runs, and Enduro’s. I spent most of my days riding with friends who did compete, and they were mostly “A” riders. I have found that the difference between a “recreational fast guy” and an “A” rider is stamina. I know plenty of guys who can go fast, but “A” riders go fast for *hours*, without stopping. I am not one of them.
    I have owned pretty much every kind of dirt bike you can imagine – from Honda Mini-Trail’s, to Rokon RT-II 340 Enduro’s, from Aermacchi to Zundapp. Right around 1985 or so, I figured out that, no matter what dirt bike I was going to own, it had to have a street registration on it if I was going to be able to connect the fragmented Massachusetts trail system at all. From that point forward, life got much more complicated, and expensive, as I jumped through every imaginable hoop placed in front of me.
    After years of trying to find that “Perfect” bike, and after trying virtually everything out there, CR500’s and big thumpers (KTM620’s), the whole mid-sized 4 stroke thing - DR350’s, XR400’s, DRZ’s, the Magazine’s pick of the “Magical” KTM 300 EXC, and even 125 MX bikes, I found that the bikes that I was most satisfied with were the 175-200cc two strokes. I was fond of my 1984 Can-Am 175 Qualifier, and I eventually found that an “H” series (1995-2007) KDX200 was the bike that did everything I wanted it to. It was reasonably light, reasonably well suspended, and reasonably powerful. It could also be reasonably quiet, and was reasonably reliable (actually, they are *very* reliable).
    I had never bought a *New* dirt bike before. I always bought used. This time, I figured that I would probably not be buying another one, so I wanted a State of the Art machine. I also wanted to remain “reasonable”, and this is where the KTM 350 EXC-F came into the picture. I was considering *everything* - but the KTM’s, the Husqvarna’s, and the Husabergs soon rose to the top of my list by virtue of their 6 speed transmissions, light weight, and “street-ability” (paperwork and hardware!). Husaberg no longer offered a street legal model, but their paperwork was easy to work with. Husky did offer a street legal model, but I did not have a dealer close by. I eventually ended up at my KTM/Husaberg dealer, to pick over a 2 year left over 70 degree ‘Berg 390, and a barely left over 350 EXC. I could have had the ‘Berg for significantly less money, but I had read something about lube problems with those 70 degree motors that had stuck in my head. I picked the KTM.
    The FI kind of scared me, but, in a way, I was looking forward to learning about it. The rest of the bike just looked amazing – Slim, Hard Edged, Sharp lines – very modern looking compared to my KDX200. I had already done my homework, so I knew that the EXC’s required a re-map right out of the gate. My salesman assured me that he would have his technician take care of that for me before I picked the bike up. I threw a skid plate into the deal, paid for everything, and was good to go.
    I picked up the bike the following week. It felt very light as I wheeled it into my truck – as light as my KDX200. I couldn’t help but to think that “as long as this bike can compare to my KDX200, I will be fine”. I got the bike home, unloaded it, and stared at it for a moment. It was beautiful. I wanted to cherish that moment. OK, enough of that. I inserted the key, and turned it on. An orange “FI” light came on the dash, and a mechanical “whirring” noise reminded me that this bike did not have a carburetor! I hit the starter button, and the piston went “Ugh!” It stopped dead, halfway through its stroke. I hit the button again, and the starter powered through the compression and the motor popped to life. The electric starter systems on these bikes are “just enough” to get the job done, with no reserve power at all. The motor sounded loud, louder than I expected, with a deep tone. I blipped the throttle, and the motor did not hesitate at all. It barked loudly, and immediately returned to a stable idle. I out on my helmet and mounted the bike. The seat felt skinny, but soft enough – not like the seat on my old 1997 KTM 300 EXC. That thing was a plank!
    I pulled in the clutch, and marveled at how easy the hydraulic DDS (Damped Diaphragm Steel) clutch was to operate. One finger! No kidding! And *smooooth*. I dropped the shifter into first gear. Shift action was a bit notchier that that of the KDX, but I figured that it might smooth out after the tranny gets broken in. I pulled out of my driveway, into the street, and - Holy Crap! The throttle response on this motor was unbelievable! Every bump I hit caused my hand to shake, which in turn caused the motor to jump! I was unsure if I could even ride the bike in the dirt like this. The bike has super tall 14/45 gearing, stock, so I was able to hit 75 MPH on my back roads with hardly any effort. The bike felt stiff, and taught. I usually like my dirt bikes set up a bit softer, so I was nervous about this. I had ridden KTM PDS bikes before, and I never liked them. They always seemed stiff and harsh. This one felt no different on the road, on its maiden voyage.
    Fast forward 2 months – I have now had the opportunity to get past the break-in and accommodation stage, and ride the bike at my normal pace, on my normal trails. This bike is everything I had hoped it would be. It is a bit louder than I would have liked, but, at neutral throttle it can maintain a good clip, and still be nearly silent. Open the throttle and things get a bit loud, but the bike gets going quickly. This bike want to be ridden like most people would ride a 2-stroke 250 in the woods – just below the hit. This motor has a definite hit. On top, this bike flat hauls the mail. It is scary fast. I rarely keep the motor in that RPM range. Instead, I ride anywhere from 1000, to say 6000 RPM (just guessing). It “torques” me around just fine. A flick of the clutch lever lights the afterburners. This bike is *light* for a 350 4-stroke. It still dances around a bit on the rocks, just like my KDX did, but the rear tire of the 4-stroke feels a bit more planted.
    The PDS rear suspension did loosen up a bit. It actually feels very comparable to a “normal” linkage rear end. The KDX was much looser, though. The rear tire does hop a bit when slamming into 4” logs, but not terribly so. I am a trail rider, so I cannot comment much on how the suspension works in whops and on big jumps. I played with the clicker settings and found the best for me was – all the way out on the high speed compression, standard “Race” position on the low speed compression, and standard “Race” position, plus 1 or 2 clicks on the rebound.
    The WP Open Cartridge fork feels quite good compared to the forks on the KDX200, although the simple, conventional, cartridge forks on the KDX do work pretty well for what they are. The WP forks stroke very smoothly, and do not bottom harshly at all. They could be a bit more supple on sharp, high speed hits, though, so I may send them out for work if they do not loosen up over time. Overall, I would rate their performance as very good – for a stock “trail” fork. Believe it or not, this is really quite rare, as most stock forks that I have ridden are way too harsh for trail work.
    The rest of the bike? Well, the stock 35/35w headlight is poor. Low beam is only OK, but high beam is useless, as the fender shadow blocks the very portion of light that you need. The area behind the headlight is crammed full of wires, and it is hard to work on anything behind the shell. I had a ground wire pop off of a spade connector on the headlight, and it took me 3 tries to get it back on so that it would stay on. The wires used for the peripheral systems are thin - much thinner than you would normally find on a Japanese machine. The stock blinkers seem to be of really good quality, and all 4 are still intact after a couple of falls. The radiator shrouds are thin as well. On my first ride, I clipped a small log (or a big stick), and a half of it flipped up and smacked a shroud, just in front of my knee. When I returned home, I was shocked to see that the shroud had a big crack in it. I read that the new Beta’s have heavy duty shrouds, and this is why! The stock mirrors were removed right away. They stick way out there and look stupid on this bike. I will have to find a better option for them. The FI has been problem free, although I installed a fuel tank sock immediately. This tank sock makes re-fueling at a gas station nearly impossible, as it hampers the flow of fuel into the tank. I now re-fuel only by gas can. I have ridden well over 60 miles and have not run out yet. I suspect that the range is right around 100 miles. This bike gets reasonably good fuel mileage (50 MPG or so) – even with the EU map loaded (or so I was told). The bike starts and runs flawlessly. The stock rear Metzler FIM legal Six Days Extreme tire will need to be replaced soon, but the tire worked well while it lasted. The no-tools required, quick access air filter is really neat, and the bodywork and panels fit well. The electronic dash gives you MPH/KPH, time, lap 1&2, trip 1&2 (resettable by 1/10ths), hours, and odometer, and is pretty easy to use once you learn it (with “hours” showing, hold right button down for 5 seconds, use left + or – to turn functions “on” or “off”, or adjust). My 2012 model has the black Giant brand wheels, and I wish that I had the silver Excel’s, just because I do not want to scratch the black finish while changing tires. The matt black wheels and spokes do look really sharp, though. I geared down to 13/48, and that feels about right for the riding that I do. I can slow to a crawl, yet still maintain a 50-55 MPH cruise down the back roads with no problem at all. The shifting is loosening up a bit, but my right boot has trouble finding the rear brake pedal. The brakes work great other than that. I chose to cut ¾” off each side of my bars, then I installed some Cycra hand guards. Their Enduro DX shields match up well with the angular KTM body panels.
    Overall, the 350 EXC-F is everything I had hoped that it would be. It is plenty fast enough, and it offers a superb ride with its stock suspension. If it is as reliable as my KDX, I will be a very happy guy. I hope that I do not have to buy another dirt bike, but,… Who knows?

    4 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Banned Rambunctous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Waterville Valley, NH
    Posts
    7,282

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    Awesome writeup. I enjoyed a cup of tea and read this a few times. Thanks very much!! I just stickered my 04 250YZF in Maine and am looking forward to a trip for a long weekend trail riding.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by Rambunctous; 06-04-13 at 05:56 PM.

  3. #3
    Get Weird! maxim_X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven, Ma
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,026

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    Great review! Makes me want to run out and buy a 350. Or at least ride for a little while.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    LRRS EX 151 AMSOIL

    JCBernier -- You-tube

  4. #4
    Lifer ZX-12R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Candia, NH
    Age
    43
    Posts
    5,868

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    Now that KTM has the 2014 models on their website, it looks like they corrected the tall gearing on both the 350 and 500 EXC. The 350 now comes stock with 14-52 which is marginally lower than the 13-48 you're running now. The 500 gets 14-50 which is a huge drop from 15-45 and even lower than the 14-48 I'm running now. The primary ratios stayed the same.

    Switching to 14-48 got rid of just about all of the harsh chain slap noises I was experiencing. It's much milder now and happens less often.

    I burned through the factory rear tire in about a month and a half and have since switched to a Pirelli MT-43 trials tire with an ultra-heavy duty tube which has been fantastic. I have over 600 miles on it now and the transmission shifts nicely but I have a very hard time finding neutral. It takes such a small motion to get to neutral that with MX boots I almost always jump to 2nd. It's not a huge deal since I'm generally not stopped with the engine running for long periods of time while out riding. The clutch on the 500 is superb as well and was easy to manipulate with one finger while in rough terrain which was necessary with the factory gear ratio.

    I wish I knew more about suspension so I could see if it has more to offer. The stock suspension on my bike is leaps and bounds better than anything I have had previously so I have nothing to compare it against. I had it resprung for my weight and I haven't found anything to complain about yet.

    I share your sentiments about the headlight. Low beam is barely adequate and high is all but useless. I'm guessing they did the least amount of work possible to make it street legal and put their R&D to work on other aspects of the platform. It gets the job done but appears to be an afterthought. I blew the low beam and was also surprised by the chintzy wiring and connectors when I went to replace it.

    Keep an eye on your radiator cap. The one that came with my bike apparently had a hard time sealing and I boiled over while out on the trails. Luckily I had water available to refill what I lost. My dealer sent me a new cap no questions asked and I haven't had a problem since. I've also switched to distilled water and water wetter for the summer and have found that my fan cycles far less often while in the woods. Draining the cooling system couldn't be any easier. Remove the bottom left bolt from the water pump and then take off your radiator cap and it all comes out. So far everything has been easy to work on with this bike.

    I also found out the hard way that the fuel pump can't scavenge the last 1" of fuel in the tank. I ran out of gas about 2 miles from the gas station because I thought I had plenty of fuel. My fuel light comes on around 90 miles with a mix of trail and street time and I've been averaging mid to upper 40's for mileage.

    There is a left hand control available for the electronic dash which lets you adjust the settings and start/stop the lap timers without taking your hands off the bars. It believe it also adds a second kill switch. I don't have an actual need for it but I like the idea and may add it during the off season.

    Overall I've been thrilled with the KTM and I would buy it again in a heart beat.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "...i would seriously bite somebody right in the balls..." -bump909

  5. #5
    Lifer Chippertheripper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    the fairest of havens
    Age
    44
    Posts
    13,897

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    I want a 250xcf in the worst way.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Cliff's Cycles KTM
    NETRA enduro B-vet
    Close your eyes, look deep in your soul, step outside yourself and let your mind go.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Central MA
    Posts
    120

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    More than the 300 xcw?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #7
    Lifer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central MA
    Posts
    2,106

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    When I was shopping for my bike, I was seriously stuck between the 350, and the 500. There was a used 530 on NEDB, that I *almost* jumped at, but I just could not bring myself to buy another big bore. I know that they are "The Bike of the Year" for several magazines, and people are pretty much raving about them, while the 350 remains relatively unknown, but I wanted a great "Trail Bike", above all. Yes, the 500 weighs only a couple of pounds more than the 350, but I suspected that it *feels* significantly heavier, and bigger. Overall - I am very pleased with my choice, but when I start to think about resale value, I start wondering if I should have bought the 500. Certainly if I even had the slightest interest in Motarding one, or adding a snow track kit, I would go with the 500, but I don't. The 350 has proven to be every bit as nimble and responsive in the tight trails as my trusty KDX200's. If I could have purchased a KTM 200 XC-W with street hardware, I might have chosen that, but the mellower power delivery of the 4-strokes was something that I really wanted. The 350 can be mellow when you want it to be, or it can be a rocket if you get the inkling to ride it so. The 500's are pretty much rockets all the time. I have a brother and a close friend with 520's, so I have spent some time on some older models. FWIW - the 500/520/525/530 monikers mean nothing. IIRC - they are all 499cc, but the engine designs are significantly different, and have been updated through the model years. The 350 and 500 motors are significantly different, though, with the 500 being a SOHC, and the 350 being a DOHC. The 350 also has a much lower primary ratio, so gearing recommendations and observations between the 2 are not comparable at all.
    Both motors are *Outstanding*. So far, I do not regret choosing the 350 over the 500. It is everything I was looking for.
    BTW - If I were looking for a 300cc 2-stroke - I would be looking hard at the new Beta. The lower seat height and the super smooth running motor would sell me. The new Sachs TFX forks are now very similar to the WP OC forks in piston design. The Sachs shock is said to be "lively", and I usually like that.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #8
    Banned Rambunctous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Waterville Valley, NH
    Posts
    7,282

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    Quote Originally Posted by FirstLightning View Post
    More than the 300 xcw?
    Thats my dream bike.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #9
    Lifer Chippertheripper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    the fairest of havens
    Age
    44
    Posts
    13,897

    Re: Bike review - KTM 350 EXC-F

    Quote Originally Posted by FirstLightning View Post
    More than the 300 xcw?
    You talkin' to me?
    I have a straight xc. No W.
    And to answer your question: sorta. The 2t is nice. Real nice, but a little thumper would suit me as a enduro/street legal dirty with better road manners, I think. Not that I wanna burn pavement miles, but the connector sections and riding outta my driveway would be more palatable.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Cliff's Cycles KTM
    NETRA enduro B-vet
    Close your eyes, look deep in your soul, step outside yourself and let your mind go.

Similar Threads

  1. I actually own a street bike again: RC390 Review
    By JettaJayGLS in forum General Bike Related
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 07-16-19, 10:45 AM
  2. Bike World Track Review Kawasaki H2R & H2
    By RocketPunch in forum General Bike Related
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-05-15, 09:19 AM
  3. First KTM E-Bike review
    By gregp in forum Dirty Bastards
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-03-11, 12:03 PM
  4. Review of a review site
    By schmuhl in forum Business & Product Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-21-09, 12:08 PM
  5. Laconia Bike Week 2005 Review and Pictures (56k um, no)
    By Proulx06 in forum Rides & Events
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-26-05, 08:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •