Welcome to NESR! Most features of this site require registration, including replying to threads, sending private messages, starting new threads, and uploading files. Click here to register.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678
Results 176 to 196 of 196

Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

  1. #176
    Lifer Pittenger5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Austin
    Age
    43
    Posts
    15,202

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Degsy View Post
    Hey DB, what's it like to still be slower than a really old guy?

    Youre just experienced Degsy! Its not a bad thing, dont look at it as OLD, just experienced.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Zip Tie Alley #505

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    My favorite was you going through T2 with your eyes closed.

  2. #177
    Goodbye Sweet Dreams BLACK SQUIRREL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere between Has Been and Never Was
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,003

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Kitt View Post
    dammit - I wanna race an 848
    Me too, That would most likely make me go back to MW.

    Off topic (sort of) I crashed both MW and UL and LW Bikes and never got Hurt on the MW only the little bikes

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Zip Tie Alley Racing #444


    Signature edit by Tricky mike

  3. #178
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    15,160

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    I have raced just about every class there is at some time or other.

    Coolest - big i4 bikes
    most fun - motaahhhd

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #179
    Perpetual Amateur CEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,130

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonny Rocket View Post
    I say you should race whatever the f@#k you want.

    It will still be one of the coolest things you will ever do.
    Probably the most sensible comment in here.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Zip-Tie Alley Racing
    LRRS/CCS #103
    PPS | Dunlop | Boston Moto | Woodcraft & Armour Bodies | 35 Motorsports | Pit Bull | K&N

  5. #180
    LRRS EX #99 Kitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lake Champlain, VT
    Age
    40
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by ceo012384 View Post
    Probably the most sensible comment in here.
    next to this one...

    Quote Originally Posted by DBConz View Post
    too bad the ceo action figure would be actual size

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #181
    Senior Member catahoulabuldog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Meridinium
    Posts
    483

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    I'm going to try racing the 600 because its what I have in the garage.

    I like the power of it, and its fun to ride. I am sure that at my squid level I'd get that same rush from an sv, which might better suit my age range from what I just read?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #182
    Lifer a13x's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Warner Springs, CA
    Posts
    6,583

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    I haven't raced both at Loudon but I have tossed a 600RR, R6, and 1098 around Loudon a few times

    I haven't ever raced a MW bike competitively but I have put a bone-stock 848 (that I didn't own) within 5.5 seconds of making the AMA FX grid at the hardest track on the AMA circuit, my first time on it.


    Can I have a cookie?


    Race whatever the shit you want. I god damn love riding a big bike but for Loudon you won't catch me racing one anytime soon. When the new track is build thou... hollah!

    Mmm 1098... never forget coming into T5 at Barber 4th gear pinned, banging down 2 shifts into 2nd, backing the rear tire in, hitting the double apex, spinning up the rear on the exit, and then pulling a power wheelie thru the next 2 gears over the crest while the bars are banging lock to lock due to headshake.... GIGGITY!!


    Hey oh yea. In the motard class you get to race Jeff Wood, Shane Narbonne, Mike Martiere, Eric Wood, Brent Lyskawa, JayRoot, and a host of other random TOP DOGS at Loudon. BOOOOOIIIIIIIII!!!!!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Boston --> San Diego

  8. #183
    Lifer Pittenger5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Austin
    Age
    43
    Posts
    15,202

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by a13x View Post
    Hey oh yea. In the motard class you get to race Dollar Bill, and a host of other random TOP DOGS at Loudon.
    Yah, there ya go

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Zip Tie Alley #505

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    My favorite was you going through T2 with your eyes closed.

  9. #184
    First name on the shit list.... SVRACER01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Farmington
    Age
    46
    Posts
    16,968

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    pete, i havent checked lately but a while ago i was hearing that getting a lot of power out of the FI models was tough because you can only get so much fuel out of the injector. i know people were experimenting with different injectors but havent heard much since. the carb bikes though...you can always put a bigger set of carbs on. theres nothing wrong with the FI bikes per say, just a power thing. i think out of the box the FIs make a few more ponies, but down the HP road the carb bike will win (AFAIK)

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    When I start my KTM in the morning, rules are broken. Its inevitable...
    01 SV650S (RC51 eater)/07 690SM /03 300EXC/14 XTZ1200
    TRACKS:Firebird/NHMS/VIR/Calabogie/California Speedway/NJMP/MMC/NYST/Palmer/Thompson/Club Motorsports

  10. #185
    Unsafe At Any Speeds Jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    :lurk:
    Posts
    12,509

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Kitt View Post
    next to this one...
    hi kitt

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    EX 105
    Sponsors: Motul, Michelin, K&N, Woodcraft

  11. #186
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,573

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by SVRACER01 View Post
    pete, i havent checked lately but a while ago i was hearing that getting a lot of power out of the FI models was tough because you can only get so much fuel out of the injector. i know people were experimenting with different injectors but havent heard much since. the carb bikes though...you can always put a bigger set of carbs on. theres nothing wrong with the FI bikes per say, just a power thing. i think out of the box the FIs make a few more ponies, but down the HP road the carb bike will win (AFAIK)
    If people are getting stuck 'cause of the stock fuel injector choice made by Suzuki, they should step away from the dyno and put their 'tuning' cert down*.

    SOP in this case is to A) Up the pressure on the fuel rail, more pressure == more fuel per squirt, then B) you nailed it, higher flow injectors.

    Ideally you should be getting MORE power out of an FI setup as you can safely run a larger diameter throttle body and still have good fueling at low RPM/flow than you can coax out of a comparable sized carb. That said, I'd be curious to know just how radical a build we're talking about where they're outflowing the stock injector.

    *I kid, I kid!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #187
    LRRS EX #99 Kitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lake Champlain, VT
    Age
    40
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurlon View Post
    If people are getting stuck 'cause of the stock fuel injector choice made by Suzuki, they should step away from the dyno and put their 'tuning' cert down*.

    SOP in this case is to A) Up the pressure on the fuel rail, more pressure == more fuel per squirt, then B) you nailed it, higher flow injectors.

    Ideally you should be getting MORE power out of an FI setup as you can safely run a larger diameter throttle body and still have good fueling at low RPM/flow than you can coax out of a comparable sized carb. That said, I'd be curious to know just how radical a build we're talking about where they're outflowing the stock injector.

    *I kid, I kid!
    just my .02 - the stock injectors won't perform much better with higher fuel pressure.

    but - yes, no self proclaimed tuner would say FI is more limiting.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #188
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,573

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Kitt View Post
    just my .02 - the stock injectors won't perform much better with higher fuel pressure.

    but - yes, no self proclaimed tuner would say FI is more limiting.
    What's Zook got shoved in there anyways, 3 bar fuel rail and low impedance injector? (I haven't had a chance to fondle a fuelie dirt donk yet.)

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  14. #189
    Development Rider scottieducati's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Waltham, MA
    Posts
    6,073

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    I've raced on:

    Ducati 748 (twin), Daytona 675 (triple), Honda F4 (I-4), Ducati SS800 (Lt. Wt. Twin)...

    Personally, Lt. Wt. Twin or MW Twin were the most fun, but I'm also more comfortable on a twin in general... Part of what I loved about racing the 748 wasn't in the MW class, it was in Supertwins, which is a fantastic class to race in w/ good guys on anything from built SV's to Buells to 1098's.

    Had the best times in that class...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    CCS/LRRS #83

  15. #190
    Goodbye Sweet Dreams BLACK SQUIRREL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere between Has Been and Never Was
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,003

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    I am pretty sure as with 90% of us the Bikes Power is not the Limiting factor. (except of course Josh Kurlon where it is definitly the Limiting Factor) My understanding is that The chassis on the First gen are better. Its also my understanding that Its very hard to go from a first gen Chassis to A second gen and Visca Versa that the geomityy is very Very diffrent.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Zip Tie Alley Racing #444


    Signature edit by Tricky mike

  16. #191
    1/8 of a liter is plenty SilverDragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsfield, MA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    348

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by a13x View Post
    I'd rather ride a slow bike fast than a fast bike slow.
    amen to that brotha

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Neal Mulcahy
    LRRS/CCS #427 ECK-Racing 2009
    Pine Motorparts/PBE Specialists | Phoenix Graphics | Woodcraft | Moon Performance | Motorcycles of Manchester | BostonMoto-Pirelli

  17. #192
    First name on the shit list.... SVRACER01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Farmington
    Age
    46
    Posts
    16,968

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurlon View Post
    If people are getting stuck 'cause of the stock fuel injector choice made by Suzuki, they should step away from the dyno and put their 'tuning' cert down*.

    SOP in this case is to A) Up the pressure on the fuel rail, more pressure == more fuel per squirt, then B) you nailed it, higher flow injectors.

    Ideally you should be getting MORE power out of an FI setup as you can safely run a larger diameter throttle body and still have good fueling at low RPM/flow than you can coax out of a comparable sized carb. That said, I'd be curious to know just how radical a build we're talking about where they're outflowing the stock injector.

    *I kid, I kid!
    you can only push so much fuel through an injector before you need a bigger injector. its easier to drink a milkshake with a big Dunkin straw than it is with a Mcd straw. thats simple physics. sure you can put 8000lbs of fuel pressure through a stock SV injector but wouldnt it be better to put in a bigger injector and use 8lbs of press AND still get more fuel?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    When I start my KTM in the morning, rules are broken. Its inevitable...
    01 SV650S (RC51 eater)/07 690SM /03 300EXC/14 XTZ1200
    TRACKS:Firebird/NHMS/VIR/Calabogie/California Speedway/NJMP/MMC/NYST/Palmer/Thompson/Club Motorsports

  18. #193
    Is this thing on? Mr. Kurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Hiram, ME
    Posts
    2,609

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by Kitt View Post
    "I know a guy who knows a guy who crashed a 600 in his novice race"

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  19. #194
    Lifer eboos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,505

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by a13x View Post
    I'd rather ride a slow bike fast than a fast bike slow.
    Do I get any extra points for riding a slow bike slow?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  20. #195
    Lifer a13x's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Warner Springs, CA
    Posts
    6,583

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by eboos View Post
    Do I get any extra points for riding a slow bike slow?
    You race a motorcycle which gets major points in my book.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Boston --> San Diego

  21. #196
    Lifer Kurlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Waterboro ME
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,573

    Re: Lt. Wt. twin VS. Middle Wt. I-4???

    Quote Originally Posted by SVRACER01 View Post
    you can only push so much fuel through an injector before you need a bigger injector. its easier to drink a milkshake with a big Dunkin straw than it is with a Mcd straw. thats simple physics. sure you can put 8000lbs of fuel pressure through a stock SV injector but wouldnt it be better to put in a bigger injector and use 8lbs of press AND still get more fuel?
    Lots of times, it's easier to just up the pressure. Ever since FI came out, playing with the pressure of the rail has been a standard tuning technique. Plus, with higher pressure you get better atomization. The flow increase is directly proportional to the pressure bump, the only potential gotcha is if you go crazy with the regulator and piss off the fuel pump. You'd have to really crank it up to risk it on a race bike though, the runs times just aren't long enough.

    I'd like to know what people are doing that they're running out of injector timing though, I've seen lots of crazy builds on other bikes, and the only ones that could justify an injector swap were jumping from 80rwhp to mid 130s...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678

Similar Threads

  1. A belated hello from the middle of NH
    By audi in forum Welcome and Intro
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-11-15, 05:37 PM
  2. middle lane
    By Kham in forum General Bike Related
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-10-05, 07:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •