[IanfromMA]

i have a grand am gt right now...and i need something fast

i have wanted a bike and a muscle car for some time now. i know quite a bit about f-body cars, and a decent ammount about bikes. i'm kinda thinkin about a bike cuz they look like a lot of fun, and i can get one a lot cheaper than a new car. which would you rather have?

maybe i'll just get a cheap bike and a cheap 3rd gen camaro

[bigred875]

hhhhmmmmm........


Wait I know, I know...a bike.

[Honclfibr]

Originally posted by IanfromMA
which would you rather have?

Well I got the bike now and I'm holding off purchasing the camaro until I have the trailer, angry fat bleach blonde wife, and at least six dirty dishevelled children. At least...that's the dream...

[zx-stewie]

Originally posted by Honclfibr
Well I got the bike now and I'm holding off purchasing the camaro until I have the trailer, angry fat bleach blonde wife, and at least six dirty dishevelled children. At least...that's the dream...

I totally agree. If your not rockin a pimped out Civic or Type R Corolla, you ain't nuthin!

Well, if you have two cars, that in itself has great advantages for if both are in working order, and one breaks down, just pop into the other one and head off to work. And, obviously, with two cars, you can have more time to work on the other.

IMO, since you live in New England, I'd get a 2nd car. The weather just sucks too bad around here to have to depend on a bike should anything happen to your car.

I was in your same boat once, at one time, I had a V6 Mustang, and wanted a muscle car myself. So, I picked up a '94 Cobra tinkered with it over the winter, *then* got a bike a few months later....

I think that's the better sequence for New England residents...

[Jank]

If you get two cheap vehicles they will suck your money away at the speed of light! If you get a cheap car and a newish bike they will still suck your money away but only at the speed of sound...