0
That is really cool. It's neat to take it into paint/photoshop and screw around with it. If you start airbrushing out the black around square B, you can watch it start to appear darker. Dithering's cool shit.![]()
YOU'RE wrong!Originally posted by Mystery Squid
Quite simply...
It's wrong.
![]()
![]()
...
LRRS\CCS\WERA #486
I just printed it out. Folded the paper over sort of like in Mad Magazine and ITS TRUE holy SHIT
2001 RC51!!!
2007 Husky SMR 510 - no longer... blown tranny
ARRRRGHHHHHHHH why must you feel a need to argue absolutely EVERYTHING and make absolutely no sense while doing it???Originally posted by Mystery Squid
Nope.
YOU never specified it was to be viewed within another context,
thus, you're even MORE WRONG!
![]()
WTF are you talking about?Originally posted by Mystery Squid
You have to open it within software, within the context of the naked eye, the statement is false. Within the context Honclgeeker spoke of, it is likely to be true (although I have not had the time, patience, or ever remote urge to verify).
![]()
Both squares are the same color.
To put it another way, both squares have the same RGB value, luminosity, brightness, whatever.
There is no fucking context here.
This is not up for debate.
![]()
And you!Originally posted by elaineo
ARRRRGHHHHHHHH why must you feel a need to argue absolutely EVERYTHING and make absolutely no sense while doing it???![]()
Stop doing that!
![]()
And you!Originally posted by Honclfibr
WTF are you talking about?
Both squares are the same color.
To put it another way, both squares have the same RGB value, luminosity, brightness, whatever.
There is no fucking context here.
This is not up for debate.
![]()
Stop doing that!
![]()
Because it is obviously a liberal conspiracy!!!Originally posted by elaineo
ARRRRGHHHHHHHH why must you feel a need to argue absolutely EVERYTHING and make absolutely no sense while doing it???![]()
This must be twisting his mind like a pretzel. Every good neoconservative knows there is no gray, only black and white!
Ben
Originally posted by benSV
This must be twisting his mind like a pretzel. Every good neoconservative knows there is no gray, only black and white!![]()
It's that fucking geekboard of yours, I can't keep up.Originally posted by elaineo
And you!
Stop doing that!
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by benSV
Because it is obviously a liberal conspiracy!!!
This must be twisting his mind like a pretzel. Every good neoconservative knows there is no gray, only black and white!
Ben![]()
"fuckit!"
That's the BEST part...........like a Mad magazine......I think I'm the only one who got your post reference. Funny stuff snowboarder............ -Suf Daddy
Originally posted by snowborder
I just printed it out. Folded the paper over sort of like in Mad Magazine and ITS TRUE holy SHIT
Suf Daddy.
TRUE
WORD
FOOKER
-Suf Daddy
Suf Daddy.
um-m-m... nope!Originally posted by Mystery Squid
![]()
From this perspective (the naked eye perspective), WITHOUT using software, the statement is clearly false.
![]()
it's designed to fool you, to create the illusion of difference in context to the different surroundings... but it can be easily determined by the naked eye, if you can train yourself to see each block on its own.
at least... I've never had trouble w/ this one (first saw it several years ago), and I've never done a graphics-program fiddle to make it easier...
('course, it might suggest that you have a problem w/ perception...)
WWSD? (what would Sneakers do?)
"for every credibility gap, there is a gullibility fill"
jeff f
'97 RF900R
Originally posted by bemused
('course, it might suggest that you have a problem w/ perception...)
speaking of perception, how many can tell me what the pic is?
"fuckit!"
looks like a 5-bladed fan to me.Originally posted by Kham
speaking of perception, how many can tell me what the pic is?
propeller, maybe?
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple.
Me too.Originally posted by twrayinma
looks like a 5-bladed fan to me.
propeller, maybe?
Kinda disappointing, I was hoping for a sailboat![]()
it's not a sailboat... it's a SCHOONER!Originally posted by Honclfibr
Kinda disappointing, I was hoping for a sailboat![]()
a little backwards, i know...
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple.
yea propeller. kind of wondering how many can see 3d stereogram. there is a nice pic i wanted to put up but little too big and im not fixing it.
got any good one?
"fuckit!"
see fish?
"fuckit!"
so who couldn't see it? when i started looking at these kind of pic took me awhile to be able to focus pass the screen. the other one i still couldn't get is the double pics where you focus closer than the screen. like crossing your eyes.![]()
"fuckit!"
oh that's better, the new avatar. Bush avatar is getting annoying.![]()
"fuckit!"
bemused is speaking of "context" in terms of block A is surrounded by light-colored blocks while B is surrounded by dark-colored blocks, making them appear to be different shades. You are speaking of "context" in terms of god-knows-what....Originally posted by Mystery Squid
Sorry, but it's obvious that you're still wrong, and there's nothing wrong with my perception.
At least you understood the "context" concept, which some have trouble grasping...![]()
![]()