0


first gen SV650 naked might also be pretty nice... the S would be better if you're doing more highway, but the wider handlebars are probably much better for commuting.
engine's a gem, too.
hurray, strikethrough!
...adventure timeadventure time...adventure time...adventure time
2002 RC51
-Aluminum undertail, custom GP Can and mid-pipe, Jardine 2-1 Header, PC3, EBC Wave Rotors (F&R), CRG's, Goodridge SS Lines, Greggs, Black w/ Flattening and some carbon goodies
USMC - Semper Fi
POW/MIA - Not Forgotten
Yes, my experience with an EX250 is that it is a pogo stick, it's simply not damped or sprung to handle a decent sized (130+) rider at decent speeds and this makes it quite unstable on the highway.
Could the suspension be improved with work? Certainly. But to what extent and what cost I couldn't say. I don't see the point when there are other competent commuting bikes out there that are much better suited to a larger rider right out of the box and get decent gas mileage as well.
Having ridden and worked on both the 250 and the 500, I can tell you that the 500 is a much better bike in every way (except appearance? With the exception of the 2008 250 both are pretty "ugly" bikes by modern standards).
The 500 is far from a pinnacle of modern engineering, but it was put together to be a competent streetbike and I found the suspension, motor, and ease of maintenance to make it well suited as such (far less so as a racebike but that's another matter entirely).
The 250 is a cheaply made hunk of steel where the designers cut every corner to make it inexpensive and small. It serves that purpose (being inexpensive and small) but makes serious tradeoffs to do so which diminish it's capabilities as a road bike. It's a buzzy, hard to work on bike with poor suspension that is ill suited to road duty with a larger rider. IMHO. It's got it's niche in being realy the only "sportish" bike with a 250cc motor and a low seat height in the US, but I would venture that anyone who can flatfood the 500 would be much happier with the 500, for any purpose.
Well I think I've paid the price for that as far as bikes go (in odd size gear, needing suspension work, etc), and its too late to slim down now, besides...RUUUGGGBBBYYYYY (try and imagine "rugby" in a real tough voice, cuz I am that tough)
I sense some hostility perhaps?
2001 CBR 929RR
1996 ZX-7 P1
1981 KZ1000 K1 LTD
Lowell/Milford, MA
What about the GS500?
2001 CBR 929RR
1996 ZX-7 P1
1981 KZ1000 K1 LTD
Lowell/Milford, MA
When I start my KTM in the morning, rules are broken. Its inevitable...
01 SV650S (RC51 eater)/07 690SM /03 300EXC/14 XTZ1200
TRACKS:Firebird/NHMS/VIR/Calabogie/California Speedway/NJMP/MMC/NYST/Palmer/Thompson/Club Motorsports
Actually, it's not all that bad of a bike. Pretty bulletproof. Air cooled means it's less complex & a little easier to work on but it doesn't make as much power as the EX500.
My girlfriend had one until we sold it to one of Clayton's friends. He's riding the snot out of it now after some minor tuning repairs.
-Pete
NEMRR #81 - ECK Racing
Cyclesmith Track Days
Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media
'03 Tuono | '06 SV650 | '04 CRF250X | '24 Aprilia Tuareg
+1 Ninja 650R
depends how much you want to spend. I agree 100% with everything said about the Ninja 650 which was supposed and did replace the 500 (except in the US) I had a Ninja 500 which was a great simple commuter bike. My worst stop and go Boston traffic tank was 47mpg and routinely get closer to 60mpg. It is well damped and has a much more powerful engine then the GS. The Ninja 650 is a much better bike then the 500 in every respect except smaller tank and no center stand.