0


sometimes, sometimes even big companies do it, even for medical insurance for employees, its called "self insured"
the bean counters figger it out, if cost of claims averages less than cost of premiums, why not ? put what ya woulda been paying in premiums in a savings account
RandyO
IBA#9560
A man with a gun is a citizen
A man without a gun is a subject LETS GO BRANDON
What companies ? I'm sure the employees love their coverage lmao.
Yes progressive, never used it
also have 1 MM umbrella and most especially
UN insured and under insured coverage. Dumb CT only requires $20,000 liability coverage. Hi my name is doctor yacht owner you need surgery.... there goes the 20 K
The calculus of hate
It is not that I should win it is that you should lose
It is not that I succeed it is that you fail
It is not that I should live it is that you should die
RandyO
IBA#9560
A man with a gun is a citizen
A man without a gun is a subject LETS GO BRANDON
It is if you're smart. Insurance is designed and priced so that the overall losses are less than the overall payouts; that's how insurance companies make money. So on the average, the insured lose money by having insurance. 94% of people lose on their health insurance over their lifetimes, premiums paid (by them or on their behalf) vs. claims paid. What makes it worth doing is that the other 6% would have been *really* screwed without it, and you can't know ahead of time which group you will be in. If you can absorb the loss, though, and wouldn't be really screwed if it came up on the bad side, you're better off taking the risk.
To take an extreme example, if I had Bill Gates' money, I wouldn't even bother with health insurance. If I got sick or injured, I'd go to the best medical care there is, and just pay them what they ask. No forms, no restrictions on what care I would get. Just take care of it because I can afford to do it right.
Most large companies, and for the same reasons I talk about above. And the employees in question generally don't even know it, and have no more complaints about it than those with coverage by insurance companies. Why would you assume it would automatically be worse?
PhilB
"A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper." -- Ludwig von Mises
1993 Ducati Monster M900; 265,000 miles -- killed by minivan 30Oct17
I see your point Phil and you make a good one although I will have to argue your 94%, where did you get that?
Comes down to minimum damage to my wallet. Never put collision on my bike. Odds are I could replace the bike for less money than what I would pay in increased premiums from an at fault accident.
If they just increased on the bike I'd reconsider.
2012 Tiger 800 XC
I have full coverage on my current bike. The collision coverage cost me $123/yr with a $1k deductible. Even that low, I question how worthwhile it is. My motorcycle is a toy. If I lose it through my own fault, I can live just fine without it.
But then $123/yr is low enough that I carry it.
I also have uninsured/under-insured coverage. I consider that far more important.
I did not carry collision on my first bike; it simply wasn't worth enough.
I carried collision on my 2nd bike for about 8 months; just long enough to pay off the note I took on it.
I did not read through any of these posts as im on the droid phone, but to answer the question in the thread title, HELL YES I have collision insurance on my bike.
I guess if i had a 1990 zx10 with no bodywork then i wouldnt care about the insurance. But...i dont ride one of those.
I have to honestly say I do not remember the specific source of that. I work as an engineer in medical R&D, and I read a *lot* of publications, on all sorts of aspects of the health industry. That item stood out for me when I read it, and I noted the source as a credible one, but I don't remember which one.
To take my own example, by the time I get forced into Medicare at 65, I will have paid over $200K in health insurance premiums, and the odds that I will have that level of claims before then are not very high. So far in my life, my total health insurance claims are less than $10K, and most of those were little things that shouldn't have been in any rational insurance policy in the first place.
PhilB
"A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper." -- Ludwig von Mises
1993 Ducati Monster M900; 265,000 miles -- killed by minivan 30Oct17
Got it, I do get pissed paying insurance as I most likely haven't recouped 10% of what I've paid out however for my bike 03 zx6 what little it costs me for full coverage is worth it. Iirc it was 300$ for a year
I put my new Husky on the road last month, it is a dirt bike. $145 a year w/o collision, $175 a year with fire/theft/collision. It got full coverage.
-Andy
2013 Triumph Bonneville
My bike was $600. I put fire and theft on it, but no collision. I did make sure my ass is covered though, and I also have health insurance. I feel pretty set.