Welcome to NESR! Most features of this site require registration, including replying to threads, sending private messages, starting new threads, and uploading files. Click here to register.

Page 34 of 34 FirstFirst ... 142425262728293031323334
Results 826 to 842 of 842

MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

  1. #826
    Soul Rider Paul_E_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    western, MA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    15,216

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    The bigger problem was that it was unsafe to start the race with 30 mechanics and 10 bikes being wheeled about. The rules can always be superceded for safety, and that's what happened here. I don't know why Marc felt the need to do this, other than it DID look like it may go full wet, only to flip flop while they were approaching the time cutoff.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Paul_E_D


  2. #827

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    from what I saw on TV was that others were waiting on pit road to start. Once Mavrick's crew pushed the bike onto the grid that's when the red flag came out.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #828
    Rookie Rada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Granville, NY
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,904

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Without a doubt they should not have just flashed the green for the safety of all on pit road. I think they should have made them line up on pit road or do a LLP or ride through for delaying the start.

    In the end the fans saw the race they paid to see and not one decided by weather.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    The older I get the Faster I wuz

  4. #829
    Super Moderator OreoGaborio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    MA
    Age
    45
    Posts
    39,266

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Quote Originally Posted by JettaJayGLS View Post
    I mean, imagine if you gambled on slicks and you see Doucette on the grid with wets. Then he pulls a technicality to get back on slicks without penalty? As the good sportsman I know you are, you wouldn’t say anything bad to “the media.” But deep down you’d know you just lost a huge opportunity that you made for yourself, and wasn’t gifted to you.
    Very fair situational parallel, RD6 vs MM93... In all honestly, yeah I'd probably be more critical of the situation if it involved me directly, but ultimately, I don't think it changes WHO I would be annoyed with.

    If I were on that grid, and if what he (RD6 or MM93) did wasn't within the rules, my frustration and anger would be aimed primarily at the officials... and trust me, I've been there before, where the officials failed to interpret and enforce the rules properly... and it wasn't even the way they penalized someone else, it was how they penalized ME when I never did anything wrong in the first place (and was proven innocent by another official).

    That day was easily the most frustrating day of my racing career and it still irritates me to this day when I think about it... I don't have any more animosity against WHO triggered the whole chain of events, my feelings are aimed squarely at HOW it was handled by the officials (and perhaps the officials who mishandled it).

    Have we actually seen solid confirmation and evidence that MM93 initiated the tire change after it was allowed? I mean, I'm pretty sure it was, but I'm not sure I've seen anything that confirms that yet.


    EDIT: This article was very enlightening.

    https://www.roadracingworld.com/news...gets-it-right/

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by OreoGaborio; 04-02-25 at 09:56 AM.
    -Pete
    NEMRR #81 - ECK Racing
    Cyclesmith Track Days
    Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media
    '03 Tuono | '06 SV650 | '04 CRF250X | '24 Aprilia Tuareg

  5. #830
    Soul Rider Paul_E_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    western, MA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    15,216

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Yes, see my post above. The rules don't matter in this case. No arguments necessary.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Paul_E_D


  6. #831
    Lifer JettaJayGLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tahoe City
    Age
    36
    Posts
    6,323

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Listened to a few podcasts and have an evolving view. There was Marc's action, and then the action of race direction.

    Lets start with the actual rules (as I've pieced them together):
    1) If you leave your bike on the grid and swap bikes before the 3 minute board to the warm-up lap, you start warm-up lap from pit lane and return to your grid position. Then you get a pit lane ride through penalty.
    2) If 10 riders are starting the race from pit lane, you re-grid without penalties. This is not applicable to what Marc said in his post race interviews, because they would all start the race from the grid

    So basically...Marc got his strategy wrong. Further, he was not penalized at all due to the commotion it caused, and actually the riders that did it right were the ones that were penalized. This article/interview/video was pretty eye opening.
    https://www.crash.net/motogp/news/10...miscalculation

    In the end all riders that left the grid should have just been started back in their grid spots, and all served a ride through penalty within the first 3 laps.

    Marc's action - he states that he planned this all out because he knew that if more than 10 people did it, it would be a restart with no penalty. This is wrong, but if it is what he actually thought that it is a big risk and I almost applaud it. If he is telling the truth, then he knew that if only 9 people left the grid they would all be penalized.

    Race direction - the rules state that all riders that tried this stunt should have a ride through. This is a way of approximating what a flag-to-flag swap would have been. I find asking 10 riders to serve a ride through penalty to be a very reasonable risk. I agree with red-flagging and taking time to figure it out. I don't agree with the lack of a penalty.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_E_D View Post
    Yes, see my post above. The rules don't matter in this case. No arguments necessary.
    I agree in stopping the race to sort it out. I don't agree that means that the riders that caused the commotion don't serve a penalty.

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    A man of many names...Jay, Gennaro, Gerry, etc.

  7. #832
    Lifer union's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Blackstone, MA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,849

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Interesting sprint today. Good for Martin to race well. SO much for this being one of Peccos better tracks. Really no where so far.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    James

  8. #833

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Rinse repeat for the most part, good battles down the field.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #834
    Lifer Kenn157's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Saddlebrooke AZ
    Posts
    5,893

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Frankie falls asleep on the racing line once again and almost gives up 3rd.
    The sibs are amazing.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  10. #835
    Soul Rider Paul_E_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    western, MA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    15,216

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Marc's comment about right handers was ominous. Alex said Marc was faster in the rights. Marc said, I'm still slow in the rights, but I'm learning, adapting... by the middle/end of this season he will complete his adaptation to the bike and will be untouchable again. I think we are looking at the 10x world champion.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Paul_E_D


  11. #836
    Lifer union's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Blackstone, MA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,849

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    That one was entertaining. Marc showed why he is the best rider out there. Maverick looked good. Glad he got a nice result. I would be happy to see him win one to be the only to win with four different manufacturers. I don't know what to think about Pecco. It was a solid result but he needs to be better. Alex was a bit wild. Well deserved penalty. As of now the biggest disappointment has to be Acosta. The new KTM must suck. I hope they can figure something out and he can get back contending for podiums. Martin can't buy a break this year. Broken ribs sucks more then wrist I think.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by union; 04-13-25 at 06:24 PM.
    James

  12. #837

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Mavrick, When the guy is motivated, he is as fast as they come. Tire pressure rules still suck. Marc is the man. Zarco. and the rookies.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #838
    Lifer union's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Blackstone, MA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,849

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Quote Originally Posted by MUZ720 View Post
    Mavrick, When the guy is motivated, he is as fast as they come. Tire pressure rules still suck. Marc is the man. Zarco. and the rookies.
    Ya the tire rule is garbage. He rode the wheels off the KTM. The team probably figured he wouldn't be leading so they filled the tire so be in the pack. What really suck is if they filled the tire to be up front he probably wouldnt have got there to lead.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    James

  14. #839

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    so, there is a minimum PSI that must be maintained over 60% of the laps. 26psi front 24psi rear is the standard number and each goes five decimal points. This number changes at each track and conditions. No Starting PSI is required, no Max number either? So lower psi is a safety thing in Michelin eyes. those are pretty low numbers wonder what Mavrik's numbers where?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #840
    Soul Rider Paul_E_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    western, MA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    15,216

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Quote Originally Posted by MUZ720 View Post
    so, there is a minimum PSI that must be maintained over 60% of the laps. 26psi front 24psi rear is the standard number and each goes five decimal points. This number changes at each track and conditions. No Starting PSI is required, no Max number either? So lower psi is a safety thing in Michelin eyes. those are pretty low numbers wonder what Mavrik's numbers where?
    Agreed that seems really low for fronts especially. It has to be a michelin specific thing. The riders say if the front goes above 31 they lose grip and can't push. I know that even up to WSBK and MA people run over 40 in Dunlop and Pirelli front tires. I know I run 40 at heavy braking tracks.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Paul_E_D


  16. #841
    Lifer union's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Blackstone, MA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,849

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_E_D View Post
    Agreed that seems really low for fronts especially. It has to be a michelin specific thing. The riders say if the front goes above 31 they lose grip and can't push. I know that even up to WSBK and MA people run over 40 in Dunlop and Pirelli front tires. I know I run 40 at heavy braking tracks.
    Is it really low? I kind of remember the front Dunlop ntec running somewhere around 22-24ish hot at Loudon? I could be wrong its been a long time and those tires are at least a generation old now maybe two. Maybe it was the rear? I know at the very least it wasnt a whole lot higher.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    James

  17. #842
    Soul Rider Paul_E_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    western, MA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    15,216

    Re: MotoGP Discussion (SPOILERS!)

    Quote Originally Posted by union View Post
    Is it really low? I kind of remember the front Dunlop ntec running somewhere around 22-24ish hot at Loudon? I could be wrong its been a long time and those tires are at least a generation old now maybe two. Maybe it was the rear? I know at the very least it wasnt a whole lot higher.
    That's the rear

    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Paul_E_D


Similar Threads

  1. 2022 MotoGP Fantasy Leauge?
    By Yev in forum Pit Area
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-04-22, 04:12 PM
  2. 2021 MotoGP Discussion (Spoilers)
    By jimmycapp in forum Pit Area
    Replies: 436
    Last Post: 12-06-21, 04:18 PM
  3. MotoGP 2019 (spoilers)
    By Paul_E_D in forum Pit Area
    Replies: 276
    Last Post: 11-24-19, 04:52 PM
  4. Austria MotoGP - NO SPOILERS
    By DucDave in forum Pit Area
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-11-19, 06:58 PM
  5. MotoGP (Spoilers)
    By Pittenger5 in forum Pit Area
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-10-13, 03:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •