0
are studded tires better at holding traction while accelerating/turning/braking than the bridgestone blizzak?
it's for a fwd '01 corolla
Last edited by breakdirt916; 11-22-08 at 09:58 PM.
not necessarily, depends on the tires, studded Hakkapeliittas would be
RandyO
IBA#9560
A man with a gun is a citizen
A man without a gun is a subject LETS GO BRANDON
Studs fall out and the last 1/2 of blizzak tread isn't the good ice stuff
Glen Beck is John the Baptist
I've tried studded and studless. I'm presently on my third season with a set of Dunlop Graspic DS2s (studdless) and they seem to be lasting a long time while providing excellent grip in my front wheel drive Matrix. I think they are better than the studded tires. Studs are only effective on ice when they are realtively new, IMO. I think you are better off with a tire that has loads of silica in molded into the rubber, and lots of tiny tread edges; the grip does not diminish as the tire wears.
I have Michelin Artic Ice, no studs on a 96 Civic hatchback and they do a very good job. They work very well IMO on the hard packed snow at lower temps. and they really shine on wet roads. I'd buy them again.
I am getting Blizzak w60 for wifes Sienna about 270 mounted pair
Glen Beck is John the Baptist
I have Dunlop M3's that have gone through 2 seasons. Roughly ~18,000 miles and the grip is very good in the snow. They slip a little but lets be realistic, it's snow and it's slippery. I plan on getting 1 more season out of them and they handle pretty well on dry roads as well where I hear the Blizzaks suck ass on the dry roads....
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....inter+Sport+M3
They do well with dispersing the slush to keep good grip on the road.
*edit* BTW, I have a 2004 Mazda 6s, V6 with a 5 speed
a good set of snows will out stop studded tires on ice.
...these are called 'sipes'....and, in today's compounds, the tread remains flexible in subzero temps allowing the 'sipes' to grip on the irregularities on the ice.
good quality snows without studs will perform nearly as well as studded tires except if the ice is so smooth there are no irregularities...pretty rare...ever see 'studs' on a ZAMBONI???
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life.”
Muhammad Ali.
I'm running Toyo snows and love em'
HUGE difference even in FWD car
Racing Zambonis use studs
Glen Beck is John the Baptist
I'll go by what Nokian has to say about studded tires, thank you
Studded or Unstudded?
Your choice of studded or friction tires depends on your needs. Both alternatives are wear-resistant and have superb driving qualities. By knowing their special characteristics, you can choose the type of tire that best matches your needs.
Snowy or Icy Roads
If you drive more on icy roads than on snowy ones in winter, studded tires are the choice for you. Studded tires are especially suitable if you live near the coast, where roads tend to be icy during the winter. Friction tires are a good choice for snowy roads.
Wet Ice and Packed Snow
If you have friction tires, you need to be particularly careful at crossroads etc. where there may be wet ice or hard-packed snow. Studded tires are superior to friction tires on wet ice and hard-packed snow.
RandyO
IBA#9560
A man with a gun is a citizen
A man without a gun is a subject LETS GO BRANDON
If you go with studded tires, don't drive like an idiot down highways or even local roads on dry pavement...or try to hammer around turns. The carbide studs aren't sharp, infact they're flat not pointed. Hammer around a turn or go fast on dry pavement up over a crest and unload the suspension and see where you end up (loss of traction, donuts until you slam into something)
Some pinhead doing 80 up the highway did just that. that carbide is pretty slick on tar.
Also depends on what you have for a cage. I had a WRX (all wheel drive) and with all season tires that car went better than anything I had ever driven. I can only imagine it with snow tires. Now that I've got a front wheel drive sleigh, snows are a must. I'm not using studs though.
does anyone have experience with the Blizzak MZ-02?
is it worth $100 for all 4, if they've had 1 season of use?
http://boston.craigslist.org/bmw/pts/936357090.html
I only plan on using it for 3 winters on a corolla/40 mile round trip commute, and I'll have an extra set of steelies to swap them on
the google reviews show that unlike the WS-50 it's capable on ice and it rates well in snow
Last edited by breakdirt916; 11-30-08 at 06:19 PM.
bump...I'm meeting the seller tomorrow, so unless anyone has some feedback on why I shouldn't get them, I'm picking them up tomorrow
also, the seller says that he had no more than a few hundred miles on these tires before taking them off
Last edited by breakdirt916; 12-01-08 at 07:17 PM.
I doubt you'll regret the decision. Even cheap snow tires are superior to all season tires and you're getting higher end snow tires.
I have Hakka 2s on my Infiniti and stepdaughter's Saturn. Very good in the snow, amazing on braking, and they seem to last forever. I had a set of my Saab 9000 for at least 6 seasons, I think they're still going.
That being said, I would go for the Blizzaks. I have heard very good reports about them (except for the snow performance during their second half of life). It's a great price, and they will save your summer tires.
Good Luck