0


Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/...?article=46904
Isn't this the one Kingcast was on his campaign against?
Last edited by OreoGaborio; 01-01-12 at 12:51 PM.
Link doesn't work. Perhaps that's Kingkast Carma
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Works for me. I just checked it.
Got it now.
I support mandatory Helmet Laws. Its an old, long and discouraging topic. In short, I believe that the same logic that requires children to wear helmets applies. Children cant be counted on to make good decisions. Adults that insist on making bad decisions should be treated like children.PICKERINGTON, Ohio -- The American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) praised U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) for standing up against a proposal that would have indirectly forced states to pass mandatory helmet laws.
U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) was poised to introduce the proposal on Dec. 14 during a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing on S. 1449 -- the Motor Vehicle and Highway Safety Improvement Act of 2011. His proposal was an amendment to S. 1449, but he decided against offering it in the committee.
In a statement for the record, Ayotte noted that the amendment would take away the right of the people in a state to decide whether to have a mandatory helmet law "by indirectly forcing all states to pass mandatory universal helmet laws in order to receive funding for motorcycle safety.
"States without mandatory universal helmet laws -- such as New Hampshire -- would be subject to stricter eligibility criteria, and would be forced to use 50 percent of their grant funds to promote helmet use," she said.
"This amendment violates the original intent of the motorcyclist safety grant program, which has traditionally focused on encouraging states to fund motorcycle safety awareness, education and training," she said. "This amendment would divert funds away from awareness and education and, instead, use them to place federal pressure on states to enact mandatory universal helmet laws."
Wayne Allard, AMA vice president for government relations, thanked Ayotte for her statement, noting the AMA also opposed the Lautenberg amendment.
"Federal efforts should focus on preventing crashes rather than mandating what gear riders should wear," Allard said.
Besides opposing the Lautenberg amendment, the AMA has been working on Capitol Hill to try to ensure that motorcycle-only checkpoints don't proliferate around the nation, and working to ensure that motorcyclists' concerns about possible engine damage are considered before federal officials approve the use of higher ethanol-gasoline blends for motorcycles.
"We need the help of all riders," Allard said. "More AMA members means more political clout, from the statehouse to the White House. We urge motorcyclists to join the AMA to help protect motorcycling now and in the future."
To join, go to http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/membership/join.
I'm conflicted about this bill however. It's not clear to me that the federal govt should be funding motorcycle related training. But, if states want to accept funding from the federal govt, its not unreasonable to anticipate restrictions....
(It's probably not too early to move this thread to controversial...!!!)
Last edited by DucDave; 01-01-12 at 09:11 AM.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life.”
Muhammad Ali.
Is there any real social cost to riders not wearing helmets?
EDIT: And by real, I mean studies that show an econmic or other cost to the resultant fatalities and injuries?
Last edited by Garandman; 01-01-12 at 06:39 PM.
“It's 2 minutes for any capable adult.”
I bet the 'social cost' of canoes is higher than helmets...
Did you grit your teeth and try to look like Clint Fuckin' Eastwood?
Or did you lisp it all hangfisted like a fuckin' flower?
Enough fucking laws already!
2018 Harley Road Glide
2000 Ducati 900ss
2003 Harley Softail Deuce
if the feds want to help with motorcycle safety, they can mandate safe construction, no more cheese slicer guardrails
RandyO
IBA#9560
A man with a gun is a citizen
A man without a gun is a subject LETS GO BRANDON
How about the social costs of bathtubs, ladders??
How about they institute legislation that requires auto drivers to actually know how to drive?!![]()
"A skittish motorcycle with a touch of blood in it is better than all the riding animals on Earth."
T.E. Lawrence
-Pete
NEMRR #81 - ECK Racing
Cyclesmith Track Days
Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media
'03 Tuono | '06 SV650 | '04 CRF250X | '24 Aprilia Tuareg
I don't believe this is a legitimate function of the Federal Government BUT, if States want to get federal funding to improve motorcycle saftey, the helmet education is an appropriate place to start for those states that allow choice..."States without mandatory universal helmet laws -- such as New Hampshire -- would be subject to stricter eligibility criteria, and would be forced to use 50 percent of their grant funds to promote helmet use," she said.
Last edited by DucDave; 01-03-12 at 09:30 AM.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life.”
Muhammad Ali.