feel like saving $1,688,000

[bryco13]

i have and will never operate either of these vehicles, as i am poor, however, i laughed my ass off at the quote from one of the guys on that site:

I've ridden the Suzuki Hayabusa, and compared to the Veyron, it's a suck-and-blow garbage bag primarily designed for white trash and ghetto sluts in muffin-topped thong/short combinations.

Sure, it's faster in the quarter-mile; so's a nitrous-fed '82 Mustang on drag radials.

Furthermore, the time will come - and I speak from experience - when you get on your Hayabusa and IT. FEELS. SLOW. When that day comes in the Veyron, you're driving a Veyron. When it comes on a 'Busa, you're just another squid locking up the rear brake on the entrance to on-ramps.

[TIMMYDUCK]

I can happily add that I have saved those funds 4 different times, purchasing my Busa's...

[-jro-]

yea I was going to say the commentary section was good for a laugh

[OreoGaborio]

pics

classic.

Love the commentary posted by "bryco", too

[MattyC]

Jeez Alex, looks like pic #2 has non-factory chrome added to its rims. I'll spend the $$$$million+ to not drive such a douchey bike. I can live with subtle factory chrome, but aftermarket bling bling is another very sad story

[Woodsy]

Normally aspirated motorcycle engines are approaching the 180 horsepower per liter range as opposed to the Veyron's 125 hp/liter with quad turbos. I consider that some remarkable engineering.

well said

[Pleasegivesoap]

Corner and brake yes, but the Busa still has it in raw acceleration by a healthy margin.

Things may change later this year when they release a supercharged 2.4L V8 Atom making 500HP!

Ah, but the Atom can't tip over. I would call that a trump card