0


Last year Round 5 or 6, I put 100ml of 93 octane from NHMS pumps in a graduated cylinder, add 10ml water, shake and let settle, get 92ml gas up top and 18ml alcohol/water mix on bottom. Perhaps my procedure is flawed, but that seems to indicate 8% ethanol. I say my accuracy of measuring by eye has roughly a 2% variance, and there is likely some ethanol still in suspension in the gas. Pump gas in VT seemed to test about the same. If anybody can shed light on whether this is an accurate test, please do.
99 + 02 SV650 ex-race - 91 FJ1200 street - 03 KDX220R woods - 12 WR450F motard/ice
This guy ran NOS in his gixxer's tank
http://www.gixxer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=226570
I remember that one, up there with the Kawasaki build by that kid with the big hair. I can't think of his name...
Central Mass Powersports #123
1000rr, zx10r, rmz450, RE classic, r6, S4Rs, xr123, sv650(2), cr250 and a box truck that leaks power steering fluid.
The one that cut the frame for better airflow or the one that drilled the ECU? Can't remember if that was the same guy.
Yes, him.
Central Mass Powersports #123
1000rr, zx10r, rmz450, RE classic, r6, S4Rs, xr123, sv650(2), cr250 and a box truck that leaks power steering fluid.
I think you should make the same mods to your aforementioned GSXR, clearly there is power to be gained. Also, the weight savings will be incredible.
I love Shervin, talented kid.
Central Mass Powersports #123
1000rr, zx10r, rmz450, RE classic, r6, S4Rs, xr123, sv650(2), cr250 and a box truck that leaks power steering fluid.
That's always been my philosophy. Lots of uninformed people think that higher octane = more power but ironically it means "harder to ignite / slow burning"
But if I take that to it's logical conclusion does that mean if my bike doesn't knock on 87 octane gas from the street pump, I should run that?
I'm setting aside the ethanol content for now. I know it's higher on the street pumps and that's bad, but if I'm riding somewhere other than Loudon, it's hard to get my hands on anything else.
Also, I'm under the impression that doesn't necessarily hold for modern, computerized car engines or bikes - because doesn't the computer adjust the engine so that it doesn't knock, but runs less efficiently?
It's been over a decade since I took organic chemistry, but it seems like that would work. Not sure if the water would extract 100% of the ethanol, but it seems like adding an acid or base to the solution would help increase the extraction rate. Either that or melt your face off...I'm not sure - I slept through class that day.![]()
ethanol makes more power but the problem is it has to be used before it bonds with water and separates from the mixture.
LRRS Am #331
Graphic Tailor / Woodcraft / Armour Bodies / Suomy / Cycle Performance Autobody / Shorai / ChickenHawk Racing
Ethanol makes less power in a motor built for pump gas. To make power with ethanol you need to up the compression and advance the ignition as well as jet way fatter. (Assuming you're building for E85 or E100. You're not going to make up for the lower BTU per volume in E10 as you can't bump the compression/etc, there just isn't enough octane / knock resistance to do it.)
And yes, if your bike runs clean on 87, no knocking, run it as that'll net you the most HP.
10w40, but only semi synthetic.
-Pete
NEMRR #81 - ECK Racing
Cyclesmith Track Days
Woodcraft | MTag-Pirelli | OnTrack Media
'03 Tuono | '06 SV650 | '04 CRF250X | '24 Aprilia Tuareg
Kerosene
Wave at sportbikes, but not scooters or harleys
Zip-Tie Alley Racing
LRRS/CCS #103
PPS | Dunlop | Boston Moto | Woodcraft & Armour Bodies | 35 Motorsports | Pit Bull | K&N
LRRS Am #331
Graphic Tailor / Woodcraft / Armour Bodies / Suomy / Cycle Performance Autobody / Shorai / ChickenHawk Racing