0


It may not be ideal, but that pan with a pad will keep more oil off the track than nothing at all, even if you ventilate the front of the cases by accident. On that 'berg I see no reason not to get some aluminum sheet or fiberglass and make a front damn over those frame members to direct oil down into the pan.
from the 2012 rule book
19.25 Fluid Catch Pans
19.25.1 All 4-stroke machines must be equipped with a fluid catch pan of sufficient size and heat-resistant material to contain the contents of the crankcases in the event of an engine or crankcase failure. Minimum capacity of the fluid catch pan is to be 3 quarts.
19.25.2 Enlargement and/or modification of an OEM fairing lower is permitted to attain the necessary fluid retention
19.25.3 Machines not equipped with a lower OEM fairing may install a fairing in order to comply with this rule.
19.25.4 A maximum of two holes, 1” or smaller in diameter, may be drilled in the fluid catch pan. These holes are to be plugged during dry conditions, and may be opened only when the event is declared “wet” by the Referee/Race Director.
19.25.5 All fluid catch pans must be mounted in a safe and workman-like manner. (Zip-ties and duct tape do not qualify as safe and workmanlike mounting.)
19.25.6 All production EX 500’s are exempt from the catch pan rule; final approval of machines compliance will rest with the Tech Inspector.
Graham
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee — that will do them in"
Yeah, the problem with Motards is when they go they tend to put a rod though the side...but as someone said it is better than no containment.
Also it needs to hold 3 quarts - while Motards tend to only hold 1 litre of oil all the coolant can go too! swirling with the oil.
BTW the rulebook can be downloaded from here, It has been out for a while due to all the rule changes for 2012.
http://www.nhms.com/documents/2012-lrrs_rulebook.pdf
Graham
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee — that will do them in"
LRRS Am #331
Graphic Tailor / Woodcraft / Armour Bodies / Suomy / Cycle Performance Autobody / Shorai / ChickenHawk Racing
How is tech going to look at the "Belly pan" for the motards if it is a requirement that the "Belly pan" be removed for tech inspection?
Just another question not trying to fuel the fire.
I'm guessing if I decide to race this year that I will have to figure something out for my Husky as well.
Also, the minimum capacity of 3 quarts is quite a bit excessive for a motard as mine inclusive of the trnasmission oil only has 1.6 quarts in it.
Joel
nope. its simple, you don't have that stuff you don't race at all.
you have to bring the belly pan with you to tech. its kind of annoying and a pain to try to bring the bike over and the belly pan. if you can easily see the oil drain and filter (or anything else that has to be wired) and the coolant reservoir with the pan still on they you don't have to take it off.
LRRS Am #331
Graphic Tailor / Woodcraft / Armour Bodies / Suomy / Cycle Performance Autobody / Shorai / ChickenHawk Racing
Graham
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee — that will do them in"
Can't say I have ever seen any of the inline four bikes bring their lowers to tech with them.....................
I understand and agree with Graham's post that the catch pan on a motard would likely leave everything but the drain plug completely visible to the tech inspectors. Don't they want to ensure the drain plug is safety wired? That on top of the fact that motards are typically put onto their lower frame rails for stands, as mentioned previously, makes this an interesting dilemna for anyone riding a motard this season.
I don't know the guys name but I forgot to take mine off once last year and he asked if it was easy to see those items cause it would be ok if he could. I had to come back, no big deal. I took that to mean if he can check that stuff with the belly pan on then you won't get shit for not taking it off.
at least the second half of last year everyone had to bring it. I was only a couple garages over so not a huge deal but coming from the other end of the infield or center garages would suck. most guys laid it across the tank over the windscreen or over the tail.
LRRS Am #331
Graphic Tailor / Woodcraft / Armour Bodies / Suomy / Cycle Performance Autobody / Shorai / ChickenHawk Racing
Good to know that they are inspecting the belly pans on the inlines as well and not just singling out the nakeds and motards just hadn't seen it or been aware of it myself. Thanks for the info.
'02 SV650 street|woods|race LRRS #128
why would they exclude product ex500's but not motards?
"When there's a gap you either commit yourself as a professional racing driver that is designed to win races or you come second or you come third or come fifth, and I'm not designed to come third, fourth, or fifth. I race to win, and if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver."
Ayrton Senna
"19.25.3 Machines not equipped with a lower OEM fairing may install a fairing in order to comply with this rule."
Im just saying that "may" is not the same as "must"3
All production EX 500’s are exempt from the catch pan rule; final approval of machines compliance will rest with the Tech Inspector.
and why? I don't care if you use a 350 Chevy bottom end its still should apply
Last edited by lrrs428; 03-21-12 at 04:42 AM.
Because the EX Mafia has some sort of RDF like field where they assume it's ok to cut their exhaust for cornering clearance and there is no way they can fit a belly pan under their bikes... and despite the USCRA requiring pans on them for years LRRS believes them.
I'm hoping the current trend of making motards comply means the Mafia's days of running exposed undercarriages are numbered.