Dumba$$ cager => Internet Jihaad

[chr|s sedition]

Originally posted by coolriderdude
I think reckless endangerment or driving to endanger would fit the charge more ... they can charge with that for just going a little bit over the speed limit ... I've had experience before, don't ask how

I'm not a lawyer, but will be. I am in law school now. The term reckless is more narowly defind to encapsulate an idea that someone has acted in manner which is a gross deviation for the standard of care that a resonable person would use in a similar circustance. This is a step below knowingly or intentionlly doing something where the actor is practically certain of a given result. Manslaugher falls under reckless, murder falls under purposfully.

Murder is a result crime. You get punished for a result. Driving to endanger is a conduct crime, you can be punished for it even if not actuall harm comes from it (i.e. like speeding, drunk driving, etc). Driving to endanger, for sure, would be *one* of the many things he would prolly be charged with, but once there as been *actul* injury to person or property, driving to endanger is the least of your problems.

[JeffL]

I just wish someone would post his home phone number.

[Awesome]

edited the contact info out on a second thought as it might constitute harrassment.

There is some nice up to date info oin www.johnparkssucks.com

[MissTwisties]

I looked up his name on whitepages John M Parks, but on the johnparkssucks website it says that it is not him...There is quiet a few John Parks listed on the white pages, but it doesn't mean that he's on there....not everyone is listed on that thing.

[Currently]

He is living at his daddy's house.

That is what seems to throw people off when looking up his
phone number.

[chr|s sedition]

Originally posted by hessogood
edited the contact info out on a second thought as it might constitute harrassment.

There is some nice up to date info oin www.johnparkssucks.com

Jay, I think if you just repost info that is already "public" your outside of the harrassment relm...or at least I hope so otherwise Pete has a case against everyone on NESR

[mikem317]

Here's a link to the news coverage down in Maryland.

mms://wm.gannett.speedera.net/wm.gannett/wusa/Mar/030206_copcar_wusa.wmv

[chr|s sedition]

Originally posted by mikem317
Here's a link to the news coverage down in Maryland.

mms://wm.gannett.speedera.net/wm.gannett/wusa/Mar/030206_copcar_wusa.wmv

man..they guy makes a comment about bikers on the web and ends up with a news crew at his house. I love it.

[Kham]

Originally posted by chr|s sedition
Jay, I think if you just repost info that is already "public" your outside of the harrassment relm...or at least I hope so otherwise Pete has a case against everyone on NESR

i think he means if you gonna start calling the guy to threaten or making nasty comments, wouldn't that be harassment?

[Kham]

Originally posted by chr|s sedition
I'm not a lawyer, but will be. I am in law school now. The term reckless is more narowly defind to encapsulate an idea that someone has acted in manner which is a gross deviation for the standard of care that a resonable person would use in a similar circustance. This is a step below knowingly or intentionlly doing something where the actor is practically certain of a given result. Manslaugher falls under reckless, murder falls under purposfully.

Murder is a result crime. You get punished for a result. Driving to endanger is a conduct crime, you can be punished for it even if not actuall harm comes from it (i.e. like speeding, drunk driving, etc). Driving to endanger, for sure, would be *one* of the many things he would prolly be charged with, but once there as been *actul* injury to person or property, driving to endanger is the least of your problems.

don't you have to prove that someone is driving recklessly first such as they're driving as fast as you say they are? if i say, hey i did 100mph easy or i did a wheelie down that road, waht can you do about it besides registered a soandsosucks.com.

[chr|s sedition]

Originally posted by Kham
don't you have to prove that someone is driving recklessly first such as they're driving as fast as you say they are? if i say, hey i did 100mph easy or i did a wheelie down that road, waht can you do about it besides registered a soandsosucks.com.

yeah, witnesses, like police and the such...or they can recreate the accident and figure out speed at impact, etc pretty accuratlly

[Currently]

Mr. Parks legal credentials have been dug up from a biker on another board and submitted to the central repository among just about every other bike board in the continental US.


UPDATE YOUR GONNA LOVE THIS...



http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...Disclaimer.jis

Put in Parks John M

check out all ones with a birth date of 02-19-1982.

Driving without a license.. driving an unregistered vehicle.. impersonating emergency vehicle.. domestic voilence.. 2nd degree assault.. carrying deadly weapon etc...

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...etailLoc=CIVIL

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...ailLoc=TRAFFIC

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...ilLoc=CRIMINAL

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...ailLoc=TRAFFIC

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...ilLoc=CRIMINAL

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...ilLoc=CRIMINAL

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...etailLoc=CIVIL

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...ailLoc=TRAFFIC



John M parks.. with his good character and reputation would never drive without a licenese... or a fake cop car.. or run people off the road.. or harm people.. or break countless laws..

[highsider]

Originally posted by chr|s sedition
I'm not a lawyer, but will be. I am in law school now. The term reckless is more narowly defind to encapsulate an idea that someone has acted in manner which is a gross deviation for the standard of care that a resonable person would use in a similar circustance. This is a step below knowingly or intentionlly doing something where the actor is practically certain of a given result. Manslaugher falls under reckless, murder falls under purposfully.

Murder is a result crime. You get punished for a result. Driving to endanger is a conduct crime, you can be punished for it even if not actuall harm comes from it (i.e. like speeding, drunk driving, etc). Driving to endanger, for sure, would be *one* of the many things he would prolly be charged with, but once there as been *actul* injury to person or property, driving to endanger is the least of your problems.

You should ask one of your professors about "Law Student Syndrome."

[chr|s sedition]

Originally posted by highsider
You should ask one of your professors about "Law Student Syndrome."

I'm on break for a week. But since you seem to know about it, why dont you educate me?

[benVFR]

Those cases Currently posted are not all for the same guy.

Looks like the domestic violence charges are a different John Parks.

What a scumbag though, the rest are all the same exact DOB so it's probably the guy in question.

And he apparently lied outright on the news as he has been busted for impersonating an officer among other things.

[mikem317]

I find myself checking www.johnparkssucks.com pretty frequently. Is that wrong?